6 Responses

  1. Derek
    Derek
    May 11, 2009 at 6:31 am | | Reply


    I hope this is not the target. The core target should be real soccer fans and the rest will eventually follow.

  2. Jesse
    Jesse
    May 11, 2009 at 9:15 am | | Reply


    Thanks for that colossal waste of time.

  3. Vnice
    Vnice
    May 11, 2009 at 11:27 am | | Reply


    I almost became the first to comment on this last night, but I wanted to sleep on it.

    This article sucked, dude.

    No offense, but MLS should focus on targeting anyone that enjoys soccer. I mean, every aspect of this guy could be debated. I especially found his age a strange thing…I mean, MLS should be targeting people in their 40′s? Not building allegience with those in their teens and 20′s? Not women? Not people who like other sports but are just curious about soccer?

    And why is he disenchanted with other sports? I know lots of hardcore soccer fans who also happen to love other sports. In fact, this guy I know down the street obsesses over soccer, rugby, and basketball.

    I think we need to take the mindset that MLS needs to target EVERYONE.

  4. Scott
    Scott
    May 11, 2009 at 2:52 pm | | Reply


    Nope– it is still too early for this type of fan soccer in the US. The competition for the population’s attention is preventing a high adoption rate…plus basketball has ruined the nation’s patience for a tacticle game like soccer. I played soccer my whole life, took 10 years off, and started back again a couple years ago (realizing I was stupid to have ever stopped). Early adopters of anything all pay a premium to be the first. This is still the case with soccer. You get maybe 40 matches a year (on a non World Cup year) with a standard cable package. You want to watch soccer, you pay a premium for FSN, Setanta, or go to a bar and spend even more money. Until it doesn’t cost extra to be a fan, it will never be widely accepted. Not to mention the fact that watching the UEFA Cup games last week then watching the Galaxy and Sounders play…is like comparing Giselle Bunchen (sp?) with Rosie O’donnell. Same sport but one just isn’t as nice to look at as the other. The MLS’ answer? Add more teams to further dilute an already diluted talent pool.

    Another problem is that the MLS is looking out for their own best interests by keeping the best players here instead of letting them play overseas further developing their skills (at the expense of the US National team). In this respect, the MLS is actually making it harder for the US Team to be as successful as the could be.

    I’ll watch when it is on because bad soccer is better than great basketball and baseball…but the MLS is not good.

  5. Jack
    Jack
    May 11, 2009 at 11:56 pm | | Reply


    Enjoyed the article, I’m a 43 y/o male and lots of the characteristics rang true for me. I hope soccer continues to grow in the U.S. I believe it is. I’m seeing interest from my brother who is 46 and from his son and daughter who are 11 and 9 y/o respectively.

  6. Theodore
    Theodore
    May 12, 2009 at 12:35 pm | | Reply


    Great article. I’d argue that that same guy would rather watch an unscripted, open format like the NCAA basketball tournament than one of our many franchised leagues. He may take his wife to a franchise restaurant once in a while, but isn’t afraid to frequent independent establishments.

    As long as the powers that be continue to try and force the square peg of the American pro sports franchise model into the round hole of global soccer, you’re not really going to reach him. Until we, like the Japanese, and everyone else on the planet, finally embrace that one of the core tenants of the game is the open model, you can talk about target audiences all you want and it won’t matter.

    Soccer isn’t the most popular sport in the universe because of a crafty business plan and slick marketing. It’s the most popular because, unlike here, it’s not run like Outback Steakhouse. If the corporate culture that runs the MLS continue to insist that their odd model will one day work, that their tight control, ownership, and efficient management techniques will produce a better product than the rest of the world, U.S. club soccer will continue to stagnate.

    Soccer’s global success is rooted in the fact that it didn’t get bought up by a consortium that was more interested in profits than in the game itself. It’s success is due to thousands of investors that wanted to give back to their community, that didn’t measure all of their profits in cash, and whose spouses probably never let them hear the end of it. It’s a sport. It makes no real sense, and that’s the secret to it’s success.

Leave a Reply