11 Responses

  1. F.F.
    F.F.
    April 27, 2010 at 1:54 am | | Reply


    Seldom have I read so much that said so little.

    Oh, and you never actually got to Onalfo (or for that matter Kaspar and Payne) — you know, the guys who, as you say, are supposed to put all these pieces together, but who have actually failed miserably to build an effective MLS team.

  2. Chris Riordan
    Chris Riordan
    April 27, 2010 at 8:16 am | | Reply


    FF, I’m sorry that you feel this way. It took me a while to write this, so you can imagine how it feels to know it wasn’t appreciated.

    You’re entitled to your opinion. It’s good to have feedback either way.

    I tried to tell United’s recent story of core change, while leaving their problems between the lines. As for Onalfo, I’ll get to him later.

    I’ll try to make sure I stay on point more in the future.

  3. CTBlues
    CTBlues
    April 27, 2010 at 9:04 am | | Reply


    Move to the Rent in Hartford!

  4. Charles
    Charles
    April 27, 2010 at 11:46 am | | Reply


    You can call DC a cornerstone of MLS, but if it is MLS is in trouble. They have won four MLS Cups and still have average MLS support, which isn’t great and not growing at all. For those that support DC that is not a slam on you, but there is very little support in the city.

    There are four corners to every building and currently the pacific northwest seems to be the one that MLS will rely on to grow the building bigger.

    Secondly, this is a parity league, just because the team is named United doesn’t mean that MLS will be the joke of the EPL and have you win every year. Down years are part of the gig. Rebuild and come back strong.

  5. Charles
    Charles
    April 27, 2010 at 11:54 am | | Reply


    BTW, appreciate the article. I do think there is an EPL attitude sometimes.

    DC will win, team x will always lose. However, this is the US, even the Saints win a SuperBowl sometimes.

    When DC lost in the US Open Cup last year, that was not some massive FA Cup upset, Seattle had a better team last year. Something you never would bother to say in the EPL…”better luck next year”

  6. Luis
    Luis
    April 27, 2010 at 12:09 pm | | Reply


    I think that also we need to remember the amount of teams that are in the MLS now compared to when DC was winning consistently. It is much more difficult in my opinion to stay competitive in a league of 16 teams than a league of 10 teams. With this logic, DC is going to have even a tougher time next year as the team expands to 18 teams.

  7. Cavan
    Cavan
    April 27, 2010 at 2:32 pm | | Reply


    Solid roster analysis.

    United went through the wilderness back in the early 2000′s. They had a great core in the middle of the decade that won an MLS Cup and two Supporter Shields. They’ll be back. This year is about reconfiguring the core. They’ll start to look better in the last two months of the season but miss the playoffs. Next year you’ll see a more coherent team.

    It happens to every MLS team. The Revs are going through a similar process as are the Dynamo. The Galaxy went through the woods in 2006-2008. The fire wmet through the woods in 2004. United will be back. They’re finally cleaning up and restartim from the 2008 roster debacle.

  8. Chris Riordan
    Chris Riordan
    April 27, 2010 at 3:11 pm | | Reply


    Cavan, you’re feeling my sentiments exactly. Every team that recharges or replaces their core experiences this. This also wouldn’t be DCU’s first time going through such a process.

  9. Chris Webb
    Chris Webb
    April 27, 2010 at 7:29 pm | | Reply


    Chris,

    Shoot me an e-mail. Want to see if you would like to come on the show this Sunday evening..

  10. jeff fleishman
    April 30, 2010 at 6:32 pm | | Reply


    Nice work on a thoughtful analysis of the interrelated elements that comprise success on the pitch. As a successful championship coach at the Mens amateur first division level here in the Metro Washington area I had the blessing of four players in the defense and two in the midfield that held the team together from 1988 to 1998. I learned that It required a beginning roster of 24 players to field 14 viable players by seasons end. So the vulnerabilities of these maturing athletes lead to constant shuffling in the positioning of players; yet we maintained a winning chemistry through having those core guys who new and loved each other.
    Your article demonstrated a keen eye for soccer reporting. Keep up the good work as you answered the central question I was looking to have answered when I Googled – DC United Problems?

  11. louis vuitton
    August 30, 2010 at 4:40 am | | Reply


    hey,this is one of the best posts that I’ve ever seen; you may include some more ideas in the same theme. I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post.

Leave a Reply