T&T 0–3 US: The Victory of “Anti Football”

by Kartik Krishnaiyer on September 11, 2008 · 5 comments

867559172 soccer friendly england v usa wembley stadium T&T 0 3 US: The Victory of Anti Football

On a day when foot­ball finally came home in the form of England’s heroic 4–1 vic­tory over an arro­gant and vastly over rated Croa­t­ian side, “anti-football” scored a big vic­tory as well.  While young­ster Theo Wal­cott pro­vided the hero­ics for Eng­land, no young­ster of Walcott’s cal­iber was in the neg­a­tive look­ing and tac­ti­cal side Coach Bob Bradley sent out for the United States against a weak­ened Trinidad and Tobago team which was going to be run off the pitch by any side with a pulse last night. Instead of call­ing in Walcott’s Amer­i­can fac­sim­i­les Freddy Adu or Jozy Alti­dore, the United States fielded a safe lineup which fea­tured Clint Dempsey and DaMar­cus Beasley exploit­ing the flanks and a 3–0 US vic­tory. Given the weak­ness of the oppo­si­tion and the ease with which oth­er­wise shaky inter­na­tion­als like Beasley and Dempsey dom­i­nated their mark­ers, would not this have been the per­fect occa­sion to enter Jozy Alti­dore and Freddy Adu to World Cup qualifying?

The Amer­i­can vic­tory while deserved was not pretty. Unlike the Mexico-Canada match going on at the very same time in Chi­a­pas, the US lacked artistry or any sort of tech­ni­cal on the ball skill in this match. When you are fac­ing a young side that’s going to be eas­ily over­whelmed, results like this one occur, but the inabil­ity of the United States to con­trol pos­ses­sion in the mid­field was appar­ent. Freddy Adu would help Bob Bradley’s side in this regard instead of watch­ing the US hoof the for­ward or sim­ply play unat­trac­tive foot­ball which is bound to be los­ing foot­ball come South Africa 2010.

Mexico’s two young­sters, Car­los Vela and Gio­vanni Dos San­tos didn’t have the best of matches tonight against an extremely game Cana­dian side. They did not have too: Their man­ager Sven Goran Eriks­son real­izes the occa­sion and the need to build the strongest pos­si­ble side for South Africa. After all Sven left Eng­land some­thing spe­cial by tak­ing its future star­let Theo Wol­cott to World Cup 2006, which in turn increased his under­stand­ing of inter­na­tional foot­ball allow­ing him to hum­ble the arro­gant Croa­t­ians in Zagreb.

But the Amer­i­cans don’t take these sorts of steps: play­ing it safe both on the pitch and with regards to player selec­tion is the norm in US Soc­cer. Today’s result not with­stand­ing every sub­se­quent match­day for Dos San­tos and Vela where Alti­dore and Adu do not par­tic­i­parte is a vic­tory for Mex­ico in the long term bat­tle with the United States for regional supremacy.

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…

5 comments… read them below or add one

1 Svenalike September 11, 2008 at 8:22 am

If Sven-Goran Eriksson comes close (with Mexico) to matching his record with “the Three Lions” (only five competitive games lost 2001-2006), “El Tri” may be the team to fear in the qualifyers and in South Africa?
I wonder how Fabio Capello's England team are feeling about the prospect of potentially being KO'd by their old boss…… What potential irony after labeling Eriksson an “underachiever”, even with his un-matched statistics?
The Central America AND European qualifyers are getting more “interesting” all the time….

Reply

2 Ash September 11, 2008 at 9:39 am

Hilarious. Four days ago England was a pariah following their 2-0 win over Andorra. Now they're soccer's greatest heroes.

It's human nature to believe that the unknown quantity is always a better choice than the known, which is why so many people are screaming “Adu!” and “Altidore!”. But coaches have to base selections on performance, past and present. When and if Adu and Altidore get some regular playing time, they'll start getting more looks at the national level. Adu in particular has never shown much at the club level. In over four years as a pro, he's never been a regular – not in MLS, not for Benfica. We'll see what happens at Monaco. Now Adu has excelled in our youth squads (including the Olympic squad), but that's a poor gauge of performance at the club or national level. In youth tournaments, Adu's tiny stature isn't the great disadvantage it continues to be for club and country.

I'm more optimistic about Altidore's prospects, but he still needs tto show it as a club regular. Hopefully he'll get that opportunity soon.

Reply

3 Nick September 11, 2008 at 10:34 am

Did you actually watch the US game?

While I would certainly not call the game artistic, I think “Negative Football” is entirely too err Negative.

The US dominated the game and did so by keeping ball possession for long streches. Some of the ball possession domonstrate a high level of technical skill as 7, 8 or 9 one touch passes took the US out of the back or broke through the middle of the field.

The US defense and midfield played very well. However, I thought Beasley was still showing the effects of a lack of games in fitness and level of sharpness.

My primary quibble would be that against a clearly inferior opponent, Bradley still played a faily defensive alignment.

Reply

4 Garbaggio September 11, 2008 at 11:35 am

Are you the same joker who thinks Canada's starting eleven has more talent than the US? Didn't control the midfield? Put down the crack pipe.

Reply

5 Jeff September 13, 2008 at 1:06 pm

A good piece in the NY Times basically agreeing with you that these are all wasted opportunities. Every game the US plays without Jozy we're losing time and ground on our opponents.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: