<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toronto FC: Finally Canada’s Team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225</link>
	<description>Daily Analysis of Major League Soccer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: mouthe bello</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225#comment-19321</link>
		<dc:creator>mouthe bello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=2225#comment-19321</guid>
		<description>bon soir je mas pelle mouthe je suie un jeune foutbaleur ou cameroune je sue terais joe votre ja piona un joure mai je ne sait pas coman acede ci vous pouve mede cile vous plais une reponce de vous meferais riyalize mai reve je vous zemai touse porte vous bien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bon soir je mas pelle mouthe je suie un jeune foutbaleur ou cameroune je sue terais joe votre ja piona un joure mai je ne sait pas coman acede ci vous pouve mede cile vous plais une reponce de vous meferais riyalize mai reve je vous zemai touse porte vous bien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Rawn</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225#comment-13821</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Rawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=2225#comment-13821</guid>
		<description>I just stumbled across this site trying to follow up on the recent games in the Canadian Champions League play.  Lot’s of interesting and sometimes funny stuff.  I was most intrigued to read some of this “anti-Canadian” sentiments and don’t worry, it’s not taken personally.  As a concerned Canadian citizen over the state of football (of the round ball variety), I only wish there was more of this sort of sentiment.  Please, do us the favour and don’t just stop further participation of Canadian cities in “your” league, but kick out TFC while you are at it.  Eplnfl, I appreciate your friendly attitude towards your northern neighbours, but I have to agree with Zeran that only way we are going to develop the sport here is by having our own national league.  I was so disappointed when TFC became a participant in the MLS because it spelt a serious blow to our football aspirations for the simple reason (a few times voiced on this site), at most we will get three teams in the American context.  Canada should have its own twelve-team league which means MLS teams in our three largest cities will only deny nine other cities professional teams and all that development that would lead to.  Many of you have acknowledged that the MLS is mostly about the bottom-line where it should be about development of the local players.  We seem to be on the same page.  For Canada the issue is further exacerbated in that as a “business only” institution, American business interests in the MLS won’t consider any of the smaller Canadian cities.  We had a Canadian league, the CSL at fourteen teams that was, I’m going to suggest, “deep-sixed” by a manager of the Vancouver Whitecaps, Bob Lenarduzzi, as he could only feel fulfilled by playing the game in an American context.  Being raised in front of American T.V. can have that affect on Canadian kids.  With his “screw the rest of Canada attitude”, he ensured that Canada would never again participate in the World Cup at least in my life-time.  The math is easy.  Participation in an American league will limit us to 10% of American development as that will be the percentage of cities (maximum) allowed in Canada.  That is simply not enough.  The problem with the Lenarduzzi approach is it has set the approach other business types have followed, TFC went directly to MLS, Mr. Saputo took the Impact to the USL and of course wants into the MLS.  Lenarduzzi has single-handedly done more damage to development of the sport in this country than can be imagined.  The single most important factor in developing any human ability is participation by the greatest number, not sitting and watching someone else.  That would be achieved in Canada by the creation, or re-creation, of our Canadian league.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just stumbled across this site trying to follow up on the recent games in the Canadian Champions League play.  Lot’s of interesting and sometimes funny stuff.  I was most intrigued to read some of this “anti-Canadian” sentiments and don’t worry, it’s not taken personally.  As a concerned Canadian citizen over the state of football (of the round ball variety), I only wish there was more of this sort of sentiment.  Please, do us the favour and don’t just stop further participation of Canadian cities in “your” league, but kick out TFC while you are at it.  Eplnfl, I appreciate your friendly attitude towards your northern neighbours, but I have to agree with Zeran that only way we are going to develop the sport here is by having our own national league.  I was so disappointed when TFC became a participant in the MLS because it spelt a serious blow to our football aspirations for the simple reason (a few times voiced on this site), at most we will get three teams in the American context.  Canada should have its own twelve-team league which means MLS teams in our three largest cities will only deny nine other cities professional teams and all that development that would lead to.  Many of you have acknowledged that the MLS is mostly about the bottom-line where it should be about development of the local players.  We seem to be on the same page.  For Canada the issue is further exacerbated in that as a “business only” institution, American business interests in the MLS won’t consider any of the smaller Canadian cities.  We had a Canadian league, the CSL at fourteen teams that was, I’m going to suggest, “deep-sixed” by a manager of the Vancouver Whitecaps, Bob Lenarduzzi, as he could only feel fulfilled by playing the game in an American context.  Being raised in front of American T.V. can have that affect on Canadian kids.  With his “screw the rest of Canada attitude”, he ensured that Canada would never again participate in the World Cup at least in my life-time.  The math is easy.  Participation in an American league will limit us to 10% of American development as that will be the percentage of cities (maximum) allowed in Canada.  That is simply not enough.  The problem with the Lenarduzzi approach is it has set the approach other business types have followed, TFC went directly to MLS, Mr. Saputo took the Impact to the USL and of course wants into the MLS.  Lenarduzzi has single-handedly done more damage to development of the sport in this country than can be imagined.  The single most important factor in developing any human ability is participation by the greatest number, not sitting and watching someone else.  That would be achieved in Canada by the creation, or re-creation, of our Canadian league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225#comment-9398</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=2225#comment-9398</guid>
		<description>Zeran, while i agree TFC has done a poor job of developing Canadian talent, the Whitecaps are taking the lead with a revolutionary academy system for North America.  Unfortunately Garber will probably shut it down, even though it would produce great tonnes of talent for both American and Canadian teams.  The special rules for TFC have done nothing to promote Canadian talent in MLS and I&#039;m very disappointed in this, despite being a TFC fan.  I would say that they are Ontario&#039;s team at the most, even though I am from Western Canada.  Western Canada (which BC is not despite being the furthest west as there are special rules for Canadian geography) doesn&#039;t care about futbol.  Montreal is Quebec&#039;s team, and the Whitecaps FC are BC&#039;s team.  

The plans for the CSL are to expand it to western canada by 2010, which would do wonders for increasing the profile of soccer, but not likely improve talent too much in Canada.  These teams are semi-pro.

A good step to taking the CSL and Canadian soccer serious would be to include the CSL champion in the Nutrilite Championship, which I have repeatedly stressed is something the CSA has to do in order to improve futbol in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zeran, while i agree TFC has done a poor job of developing Canadian talent, the Whitecaps are taking the lead with a revolutionary academy system for North America.  Unfortunately Garber will probably shut it down, even though it would produce great tonnes of talent for both American and Canadian teams.  The special rules for TFC have done nothing to promote Canadian talent in MLS and I’m very disappointed in this, despite being a TFC fan.  I would say that they are Ontario’s team at the most, even though I am from Western Canada.  Western Canada (which BC is not despite being the furthest west as there are special rules for Canadian geography) doesn’t care about futbol.  Montreal is Quebec’s team, and the Whitecaps FC are BC’s team.  </p>
<p>The plans for the CSL are to expand it to western canada by 2010, which would do wonders for increasing the profile of soccer, but not likely improve talent too much in Canada.  These teams are semi-pro.</p>
<p>A good step to taking the CSL and Canadian soccer serious would be to include the CSL champion in the Nutrilite Championship, which I have repeatedly stressed is something the CSA has to do in order to improve futbol in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeran</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225#comment-9386</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 17:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=2225#comment-9386</guid>
		<description>Being anti-MLS-in-Canada is not the same thing as being anti-Canadian.  That term is in itself, stupid.  

I am of the opinion that having a sold out stadium in Toronto and Vancouver is good on the financial side for MLS, and that&#039;s great for the investors and people who run the league, but not for soccer in Canada.  To use an example, look at how good the U.S. has become with having 24 professional hockey teams.  The spectators and money is all American, but the players are heart and soul are Canadian.  That will be the same for MLS, only reversed.  If Canada actually had a pair and made their own league, with a mindset to improve Canadian soccer, like what Australia has done (who has a smaller population than Canada), Canadian soccer would improve by leaps and bounds.  Being dependent on the U.S. for everything won&#039;t help nearly as much, and MLS is still and will always be geared for the betterment of the United States, despite Canadian feelings of entitlemen

Toronto FC is Toronto&#039;s team, not Canada&#039;s, just like the Blue Jays are Toronto&#039;s baseball team, and the Raptors are Toronto&#039;s basketball team, or how the Canadiens are Montreal&#039;s hockey team.  Having a Canadian team didn&#039;t seem to help the Canadian national team play any better in qualifiers, and the players it helped develop, like Maurice Edu, were actually American.  It&#039;s the same situation with hockey in the U.S.  Having the vast majority of hockey teams be located in America has only minimally improved American hockey in the past 90 years since the league began, but it&#039;s certainly given many Canadian players a good developing ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being anti-MLS-in-Canada is not the same thing as being anti-Canadian.  That term is in itself, stupid.  </p>
<p>I am of the opinion that having a sold out stadium in Toronto and Vancouver is good on the financial side for MLS, and that’s great for the investors and people who run the league, but not for soccer in Canada.  To use an example, look at how good the U.S. has become with having 24 professional hockey teams.  The spectators and money is all American, but the players are heart and soul are Canadian.  That will be the same for MLS, only reversed.  If Canada actually had a pair and made their own league, with a mindset to improve Canadian soccer, like what Australia has done (who has a smaller population than Canada), Canadian soccer would improve by leaps and bounds.  Being dependent on the U.S. for everything won’t help nearly as much, and MLS is still and will always be geared for the betterment of the United States, despite Canadian feelings of entitlemen</p>
<p>Toronto FC is Toronto’s team, not Canada’s, just like the Blue Jays are Toronto’s baseball team, and the Raptors are Toronto’s basketball team, or how the Canadiens are Montreal’s hockey team.  Having a Canadian team didn’t seem to help the Canadian national team play any better in qualifiers, and the players it helped develop, like Maurice Edu, were actually American.  It’s the same situation with hockey in the U.S.  Having the vast majority of hockey teams be located in America has only minimally improved American hockey in the past 90 years since the league began, but it’s certainly given many Canadian players a good developing ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazza</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225#comment-9018</link>
		<dc:creator>Gazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=2225#comment-9018</guid>
		<description>Joey Clams: 

You are anti-canadian. And you are the type of guy that I have to apologize for whenever I am in any other country. Frankly, you make me sick.

What do you mean &quot;Let&#039;s assume Toronto is in it for the long haul&quot;. Where the heck would they go? They are either the first or second most popular/valuable club in our league. Then you go on about Montreal coming next. In case you haven&#039;t heard Vancouver is the next Cdn team and they will have 16,500 season tickets sold before they kick a ball. So in &quot;OUR AMERICAN LEAGUE&quot; out of the top 3 franchises TWO will be Canadian. No we don&#039;t need Vancouver or Toronto at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joey Clams: </p>
<p>You are anti-canadian. And you are the type of guy that I have to apologize for whenever I am in any other country. Frankly, you make me sick.</p>
<p>What do you mean “Let’s assume Toronto is in it for the long haul”. Where the heck would they go? They are either the first or second most popular/valuable club in our league. Then you go on about Montreal coming next. In case you haven’t heard Vancouver is the next Cdn team and they will have 16,500 season tickets sold before they kick a ball. So in “OUR AMERICAN LEAGUE” out of the top 3 franchises TWO will be Canadian. No we don’t need Vancouver or Toronto at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Clams</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225#comment-7395</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Clams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=2225#comment-7395</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not anti-Canadian.  I&#039;m against Canadian teams in MLS.  Let&#039;s assume that Toronto is in it for the long haul.  The minute Montreal is let in, then Toronto is no longer our Monaco.  Get it?  

I resent the axiom that MLS / the US NEEDS Canada.  I do  acknowledge, however, that MLS owners want Canadian money.  

I find it absurd that at team from Canada is eligible to win what is essentially the pro championship of the United States.  I don&#039;t like the fact that one set of teams will be playing by different rules.  I laugh at the suggestion that the United States of America should be emulating Monaco, Andorra, Liechenstein, Wales and New Zealand.  (Overlooked, of course, is that every one of those countries has a formalized political association with the countries in which their teams play).  

And I can&#039;t help but notice that for some - not all - Toronto FC is an instrument of Canadian nationalism.  Why all the flags?  Why the maple leaf on the crest?  And if it weren&#039;t, every game wouldn&#039;t be US-Mexico for its fans.  

The Canada that I have always adored has little to do with tribal enclaves and steel drums on a fresh water beach.  The Canada for which I have little patience is found in the haughty city-states whose residents commonly reject or embrace loyalties depending on circumstances.  

By the way, Concacaf and Fifa denied the LA Salsa permission to play in Mexico back in the 90s.  What did we do?  We formed our own league,eventually.  And when the Galaxy drew 69,000 on opening day, its first instinct wasn&#039;t to bolt MLS and find a way to rub elbows with Chivas and America.  

I&#039;m sorry, guys, but I couldn&#039;t care less what you bring to the table.  The table is ours.  And we sweated blood to build the thing.  Go build your own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not anti-Canadian.  I’m against Canadian teams in MLS.  Let’s assume that Toronto is in it for the long haul.  The minute Montreal is let in, then Toronto is no longer our Monaco.  Get it?  </p>
<p>I resent the axiom that MLS / the US NEEDS Canada.  I do  acknowledge, however, that MLS owners want Canadian money.  </p>
<p>I find it absurd that at team from Canada is eligible to win what is essentially the pro championship of the United States.  I don’t like the fact that one set of teams will be playing by different rules.  I laugh at the suggestion that the United States of America should be emulating Monaco, Andorra, Liechenstein, Wales and New Zealand.  (Overlooked, of course, is that every one of those countries has a formalized political association with the countries in which their teams play).  </p>
<p>And I can’t help but notice that for some — not all — Toronto FC is an instrument of Canadian nationalism.  Why all the flags?  Why the maple leaf on the crest?  And if it weren’t, every game wouldn’t be US-Mexico for its fans.  </p>
<p>The Canada that I have always adored has little to do with tribal enclaves and steel drums on a fresh water beach.  The Canada for which I have little patience is found in the haughty city-states whose residents commonly reject or embrace loyalties depending on circumstances.  </p>
<p>By the way, Concacaf and Fifa denied the LA Salsa permission to play in Mexico back in the 90s.  What did we do?  We formed our own league,eventually.  And when the Galaxy drew 69,000 on opening day, its first instinct wasn’t to bolt MLS and find a way to rub elbows with Chivas and America.  </p>
<p>I’m sorry, guys, but I couldn’t care less what you bring to the table.  The table is ours.  And we sweated blood to build the thing.  Go build your own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225#comment-7391</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=2225#comment-7391</guid>
		<description>And all these places were in a stones throw from a major centre...  Vancouver 2010 is actually Whistler 2010...but nevermind the fact.

As for the Montreal game, I was there.  Great watch.  I was maybe row in the 20th-30th row, just right of midfield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And all these places were in a stones throw from a major centre…  Vancouver 2010 is actually Whistler 2010…but nevermind the fact.</p>
<p>As for the Montreal game, I was there.  Great watch.  I was maybe row in the 20th-30th row, just right of midfield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashlee vance</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225#comment-7387</link>
		<dc:creator>ashlee vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=2225#comment-7387</guid>
		<description>&gt;If Vancouver was smaller than Winnipeg, it would not get the Olympics in 2010. 

God, I love people who are clueless and then share it with the world.

Many Winter Games are held in small villages like Val D&#039;Isere.

Lillehammer had a population of around 20,000 people when they had their games.
And Albertville also had about 20,000 people.
Lake Placid is a hole in the countryside, Im not even sure its a town.
Nagano is about 350,000.

Thanks for playing. See ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;If Vancouver was smaller than Winnipeg, it would not get the Olympics in 2010. </p>
<p>God, I love people who are clueless and then share it with the world.</p>
<p>Many Winter Games are held in small villages like Val D’Isere.</p>
<p>Lillehammer had a population of around 20,000 people when they had their games.<br />
And Albertville also had about 20,000 people.<br />
Lake Placid is a hole in the countryside, Im not even sure its a town.<br />
Nagano is about 350,000.</p>
<p>Thanks for playing. See ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashlee vance</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225#comment-7386</link>
		<dc:creator>ashlee vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=2225#comment-7386</guid>
		<description>Big problem for the FC to be Canada&#039;s team is that rest of Canada cant stand the habit of the national media which is based in Toronto to think of themselves as the center of the universe. I cant think of many people from coast to coast who feel that Toronto represents them in any way. Hell, I think saying that would be enough for people to root against Toronna out of principle.

Another problem is the  TO team sucks and should be grateful that they cant drop down divisions like crappy teams should.

And finally, the concept of Canadian national identity is rather vague. Since the advent of US cable TV in the 70s, the social and cultural fabric of society is molded south of the border. (they force black history month in canada in schools as well and the contents are strictly US figures. even teachers dont know enough to make the sham palatable.)

Of course, when it comes to football, canadians still consider themselves inferior in every way which is why every CBC, TSN, RDS broadcast has to have at least one british/french (from france) voice to give legitimacy to the product.

Btw, Toronto is no more cosmopolitain than either NYC or Montreal. They are however  the canadian city which most resembles drab US cities like Cleveland and the one with the most US style violence and race problems..

Btw, Montreal got 56,000 for their game tonight while MSL Houston had about 7,000 for their game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big problem for the FC to be Canada’s team is that rest of Canada cant stand the habit of the national media which is based in Toronto to think of themselves as the center of the universe. I cant think of many people from coast to coast who feel that Toronto represents them in any way. Hell, I think saying that would be enough for people to root against Toronna out of principle.</p>
<p>Another problem is the  TO team sucks and should be grateful that they cant drop down divisions like crappy teams should.</p>
<p>And finally, the concept of Canadian national identity is rather vague. Since the advent of US cable TV in the 70s, the social and cultural fabric of society is molded south of the border. (they force black history month in canada in schools as well and the contents are strictly US figures. even teachers dont know enough to make the sham palatable.)</p>
<p>Of course, when it comes to football, canadians still consider themselves inferior in every way which is why every CBC, TSN, RDS broadcast has to have at least one british/french (from france) voice to give legitimacy to the product.</p>
<p>Btw, Toronto is no more cosmopolitain than either NYC or Montreal. They are however  the canadian city which most resembles drab US cities like Cleveland and the one with the most US style violence and race problems..</p>
<p>Btw, Montreal got 56,000 for their game tonight while MSL Houston had about 7,000 for their game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kartik</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/toronto-fc-canadas-team/2225#comment-7381</link>
		<dc:creator>Kartik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=2225#comment-7381</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t disagree with you Joey. I&#039;m just stating the perception: Canadian cities are more cosmopolitan than American cities.

 I&#039;ve chosen to live most of my life in the Miami area for a reason. 

For the record I strongly opposed expansion to Canada when it was first discussed. I also favor stronger squad limits on foreign players throughout MLS, so we don&#039;t go the way of the Mexican League . (Mexico&#039;s national team has partly collapsed due to the high number of foreign players in the league.)

  But since TFC is around, I believe the core of that team should be Canadian and not British as it was thanks to Mo Johnston and John Carver&#039;s handiwork. 

The cosmopolitan issue doesn&#039;t entitle anyone to a team. My area is among the most cosmopolitan in the US, and MLS flopped here and USL is flopping. (more on that real soon)

But Toronto is getting their share of hate from American fans who like me opposed expansion to Canada. It&#039;s done- they&#039;ve been in the league 3 years. The least they can do is be a more Canadian oriented team than the insulting group of Championship/League 1/SPL players that Mo and Carver assembled at the start of last season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t disagree with you Joey. I’m just stating the perception: Canadian cities are more cosmopolitan than American cities.</p>
<p> I’ve chosen to live most of my life in the Miami area for a reason. </p>
<p>For the record I strongly opposed expansion to Canada when it was first discussed. I also favor stronger squad limits on foreign players throughout MLS, so we don’t go the way of the Mexican League . (Mexico’s national team has partly collapsed due to the high number of foreign players in the league.)</p>
<p>  But since TFC is around, I believe the core of that team should be Canadian and not British as it was thanks to Mo Johnston and John Carver’s handiwork. </p>
<p>The cosmopolitan issue doesn’t entitle anyone to a team. My area is among the most cosmopolitan in the US, and MLS flopped here and USL is flopping. (more on that real soon)</p>
<p>But Toronto is getting their share of hate from American fans who like me opposed expansion to Canada. It’s done– they’ve been in the league 3 years. The least they can do is be a more Canadian oriented team than the insulting group of Championship/League 1/SPL players that Mo and Carver assembled at the start of last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
