13 Responses

  1. USA 2010 (formerly known as Kartik)
    USA 2010 (formerly known as Kartik)
    January 5, 2010 at 11:37 pm | | Reply


    EVEN Chris Johnson? Who the eff is he? More like Chad Ochocinco. But who cares if they’re tweeting? It certain hasn’t helped put soccer as a sport that is discussed on tv and in newspapers instead of repeating AP reports verbatim.

    1. Matthew N
      Matthew N
      January 6, 2010 at 7:48 am | | Reply


      You know, my momma told me that if you don’t have anything nice to say, you shouldn’t say it at all. In your case, you should probably just stop posting altogether.

    2. Charles
      Charles
      January 6, 2010 at 9:48 am | | Reply


      You might want to pick up a sports section once in a while, he lead the NFL in rushing.

  2. Oscar
    Oscar
    January 6, 2010 at 1:54 am | | Reply


    WTF, pro Sounders items? Oh, my bad, thought you were Kartik.

    I spent many a late night this year reliving moments and pondering futures for soccer at multiple levels of competition. Nail-biters, meaningful victories and meaningful defeats all over kept me and my fellow pub-dwellers riveted. Maybe I’ve still got energy because my club of choice (Sounders) are still bright-eyed and bushy-tailed. Nonetheless, it seems like a lot of establishment commentators are stuck in the mentality of 1. US soccer is growing too slowly and failing in multiple areas, and 2. We must defend US soccer’s fine, proud, pessimistic tradition of failing and growing slowly.

    Cheers for a pretty accurate “best of” list, IMHO.

  3. Charles
    Charles
    January 6, 2010 at 9:45 am | | Reply


    “The Crowds in Seattle:”

    Thank you, you are now my favorite and I am offering you the free game ticket to the Sounders over Kartik, who took to long to accept the offer.

    If you don’t include the story of the Sounders as one of the tops, you need your head examined. If every team was averaging 30-40k, attracting the average sports fan, this league would soon be the tops in the world as that would balloon to 60k very quickly when the talent started getting signed.

  4. Juan-John
    Juan-John
    January 6, 2010 at 10:48 am | | Reply


    “When a scrappy team like Real Salt Lake can claw their way”

    . . . and then what??? Dude, as awesome as this site is (and I sincerely mean that), you SERIOUSLY need to run a spell/grammar check before posting your stuff.

    1. Brian Zygo
      January 6, 2010 at 2:12 pm | | Reply


      Thank you, a couple lines got cut out in the process of publishing the column.

  5. Sounder Steve
    Sounder Steve
    January 6, 2010 at 12:56 pm | | Reply


    Take em all.
    Watch them fall

    Considering that Microsoft gave them so much money to put the tarps up, I think it’s plenty safe to say sell-out. I am leaning on the players side of the CBA, and I hope to see some flexibilty in the future so our large crowds can translate into great talent signing in the states (more specifically in Seattle)

    Some people don’t like the idea of “powerhouse” teams, but it works. US Soccer would be looked at more if we were taking out top teams down to S.A and beating some Argentinian and Brazilian teams, even just the Mexicans!! I’m all for a Seattle, LA, Toronto, NY, Houston big 5!!!!!!

  6. Charles
    Charles
    January 6, 2010 at 1:48 pm | | Reply


    I can see having powerhouse teams, I just wonder if there will be a league to have the powerhouse teams participate in.

    The Cosmos aren’t around anymore for a reason. The teams in the EPL not paying salaries right can be replaced, an MLS team cannot.

  7. Cavan
    Cavan
    January 6, 2010 at 5:05 pm | | Reply


    You want a “powerhouse team?” There’s a reason why I hate pro baseball and it’s not just because it’s boring. The fundamental entertainment option a pro sports league sells is fair competition. Anything less than fair competition is boring. Might as well watch pro wrestling instead. At least they acknowledge their results are predetermined.

    A league with rich teams and poor teams starts to feel less and less like fair competition and more like WWE. You can guess who will win most games by how much money the team spent on the roster. It’s just not fun. It will turn off prospective fans.

    Not only will an unbalanced league (money-wise) be boring, it will also be fiscally unstable. Be careful what you wish for, Sounder Steve. It’s great that the Sounders had such high attendence this year. Remember the reasons why there was even a league that was still around in 2009 for the Sounders to join.

  8. Reece
    Reece
    January 7, 2010 at 12:30 am | | Reply


    With revenue sharing the ‘big 5′ could support the rest of the teams until they decided to pull their heads out of their asses and actually compete. It would be a great idea. TFC, SEA, NYRB, DC, LA, and Houston could easily do this while KC and SJ built stadiums and revamped. Dallas and Columbus get your freakin’ acts together some of us would like to move forward.

  9. Charles
    Charles
    January 7, 2010 at 11:38 am | | Reply


    They already do revenue sharing and it worked.

    The league was very competitive and very exciting. Teams like Seattle and LA had owners that made a ton of money. That caused many more owners to want take some risk for possible rewards.

    It is really hard for me, watching the Sounders draw closer to 40k next year, thinking Columbus isn’t getting their act together. Sure their playoff attn stunk, but the rest of the season the whole league drew pretty close to 15k ( outside of KC ).

  10. Scott
    Scott
    January 9, 2010 at 1:56 pm | | Reply


    To me the biggest news: 3D sports is being rolled out for the World Cup and not the Super Bowl.

    (Also, I could not disagree more with Cavan. I am only a casual American Football fan, and I find NCAA much more interesting than the NFL because I have some sense of who is supposed to be good each year. Every time you blink it seems like some new NFL team is the best. Might as well be watching rock-paper-scissors.)

Leave a Reply