5 Responses

  1. todd
    todd
    September 7, 2009 at 2:40 pm | | Reply


    christ the Dynamo/Crew game is huge.

  2. ryan
    ryan
    September 7, 2009 at 5:26 pm | | Reply


    your 2009 attendance averages for % of capacity are still incorrect for seattle and san jose.

    doesn’t it bother you in the slightest, as a journalist, to continue to post incorrect information? i love this site and the posts are usually great and informative reads, but it just kills me every time that you’re too lazy to put up the correct information because it requires an extra 1 minute of math.

    i understand why you make up your own capacities for teams like new england and dcu, but to just do that for whichever team you please because it requires less work is shameful for a site that likes to fashion itself as a source for news/opinions. call it whatever you want, but wrong information is wrong information.

    1. Peter C
      Peter C
      September 7, 2009 at 6:46 pm | | Reply


      What numbers would you use for the Seattle and San Jose capacities?
      Seattle keeps changing theirs while San Jose is pretty cut and dried.

      From the Sounders Official Website …

      “The XBOX Pitch at Qwest Field is the official home of Major League Soccer’s Seattle Sounders FC has a seating capacity of 27,700 for soccer…”

      “Due to overwhelming demand, we have opened additional seating in the South endzone beginning with the June 28th match. Seating capacity at Qwest Field will be approximately 32,000 – the same seating capacity featured for the Inaugural Match on March 19th.”
      (don’t remember where I got the 32,400 Seattle capacity)

      Since Seattle announced the new capacity at 32,000, their listed numbers via MLSNet have been 32,526, 32,404, 32,405, 32,705 and 32,679. So what is their capacity?

      The San Jose capacity number has the matches played away from Buck Shaw calculated in. 15,682 and 17,128 for the 2 Galaxy games played at 47,416 capacity Oakland Alameda. Also the 61,572 capacity crowd counted on the books for their part in the Chivas de Guadalajara/Barcelona doubleheader at Candlestick Park.

      As for the numbers used for the teams still playing in football stadiums(excluding Seattle), why would I use 70,000+ for the Red Bulls, Revs, etc? Using the average caps for US soccer specific stadiums seemed the most fair way to present the information. As I’ve noted in the case of the Red Bulls, I’m using their posted capacity at the new Red Bull Arena, scheduled to open next season. I would bet the folks planning stadiums in San Jose, Houston and elsewhere are looking at capacities in a similar fashion.

      However, if my calculations are incorrect, please specify, and I’ll be happy to make any corrections.

      And while I’m not a journalist by profession(just a very interested fan), I do take pride in presenting information as accurately as possible.

  3. ryan
    ryan
    September 7, 2009 at 5:33 pm | | Reply


    oh, and Sunil Gulati couldn’t manage his way out of a paperbag. outside of the second george bush, has there ever been a worse president of ANYTHING? good lord it’s like sunil is trying to keep soccer a second-class sport in this country, and honestly, i’m not sure how the guy can have like 5-7 jobs, because apparently he can’t even do one right. he needs to go yesterday!

  4. Tom
    Tom
    September 7, 2009 at 11:39 pm | | Reply


    I skipped the Rapids game in order to go to Utah for the men’s national team game, but I noticed none of their promotional emails for the game mentioned the MNT game. I believe the Rapids kick-off was 2 hours after the World Cup Qualifier, why not show the game on the big screen or at least in the stadium bar and promote it as a double header night? Even if I had stayed in town, I wouldn’t have gone to the Rapids because I don’t if the game was on anywhere at the stadium.

Leave a Reply