The Week 22 numbers look like this…
| 5 year comparison | ||||||||
| Week 22 | 170 GP | YTD | ||||||
| Avg | +/- | GP | Avg | +/- | Avg | +/- | GP | |
| 2006 | 13,932 | 6 | 15,082 | 15,361 | 143 | |||
| 2007 | 16,209 | 16.34% | 6 | 16,311 | 8.15% | 16,005 | 4.19% | 144 |
| 2008 | 15,294 | -5.64% | 9 | 16,350 | 0.24% | 17,036 | 6.45% | 148 |
| 2009 | 16,236 | 6.16% | 6 | 15,903 | -2.73% | 16,559 | -2.80% | 155 |
| 2010 | 19,215 | 18.35% | 8 | 16,628 | 4.56% | 16,628 | 0.41% | 170 |
| YTD – 170 Games | ||||
| Average | Median | %<10K | %>20k | |
| 2006 | 15,082 | 13,036 | 21.18% | 17.06% |
| 2007 | 16,311 | 14,804 | 8.82% | 25.29% |
| 2008 | 16,350 | 15,078 | 11.76% | 24.12% |
| 2009 | 15,903 | 14,629 | 15.88% | 20.00% |
| 2010 | 16,628 | 14,434 | 7.65% | 22.94% |
Here are the attendance comparisons to 2009:
| MLS Attendance – Equal # of Home Games | |||||||
| 2009 | 2010 | ||||||
| Att | Cap % | Att | Att +/- | GP | Cap % | Cap | |
| Seattle | 30,412 | 93.87% | 36,174 | 18.94% | 12 | 101.90% | 35,500 |
| Toronto | 20,220 | 92.00% | 20,688 | 2.31% | 12 | 94.13% | 21,978 |
| Philadelphia | NA | NA | 20,343 | NA | 9 | 89.09% | 18,500 |
| LA Galaxy | 19,379 | 71.78% | 20,298 | 4.74% | 10 | 75.18% | 27,000 |
| N.Y./N.J. Red Bulls | 12,229 | 48.55% | 17,828 | 45.79% | 11 | 70.78% | 25,189 |
| Houston | 15,836 | 70.38% | 17,061 | 7.74% | 11 | 75.83% | 22,500 |
| Real Salt Lake | 16,213 | 78.95% | 16,755 | 3.35% | 11 | 86.64% | 19,340 |
| Chicago | 13,027 | 65.13% | 15,486 | 18.87% | 9 | 77.43% | 20,000 |
| D.C. United | 15,173 | 67.44% | 14,471 | -4.63% | 11 | 64.32% | 22,500 |
| Columbus Crew | 13,714 | 68.57% | 14,384 | 4.89% | 12 | 71.92% | 20,000 |
| ChivasUSA | 16,107 | 59.65% | 14,093 | -12.50% | 10 | 52.20% | 27,000 |
| Colorado Rapids | 12,711 | 70.28% | 12,993 | 2.22% | 10 | 71.84% | 18,086 |
| NE Revolution | 13,561 | 60.27% | 11,974 | -11.70% | 11 | 53.22% | 22,500 |
| FC Dallas | 9,407 | 44.39% | 10,889 | 15.75% | 10 | 51.38% | 21,193 |
| KC Wizards | 10,010 | 96.39% | 10,109 | 0.99% | 11 | 97.34% | 10,385 |
| San Jose | 11,104 | 62.65% | 9,638 | -13.21% | 10 | 93.57% | 10,300 |
My disclaimer about the capacity calculations
For my calculations, I’ve taken the 3 teams playing in Amercan football stadiums, DCU in RFK, Houston in Robertson and New England in Foxboro and assigned maximum capacities at 22,500. I took the 22,500 number from an approximate average of the soccer specific stadiums in use.
- Philly’s first two home games were played at Lincoln Financial Field. The announced capacity for the Union was published as 38,000 and will be calculated as such.
- San Jose’s 4th match in 2009 was at Oakland Alameda Coliseum and drew over 15,800. Their 7th match was also at OAC and they drew over 17,100. Their 11th was part of a doubleheader with Barcelona and drew over 61,500.
Observations
Columbus drew 16,700+ for its match with streaking Dallas. A full house in Toronto. Red Bulls draw 21,800+. The Rapids seem to only draw on July 4, only 11,511 turned out. Over 20,000 at HDC for the Galaxy. The usual packed house in Seattle, 36,000+. Chivas USA continues to struggle at the gate with 12,500 coming out on Sunday night.
Rookie Watch: Jack McInerney scored for the Union. Zach Loyd named Man of the Match for Dallas. Andy Najar showed why he’s going to be a star.
Kai Kamara, on my preseason ‘watch list’(bottom of post) got an assist vs LA. Joel Lindpere had a strong match in RBNY’s victory.
Week 22 Games Columbus 0 Columbus Dispatch – Crew XTra FC Dallas 0 3rd Degree – Buzz Carrick Toronto 0 TFC Connected Real Salt Lake 0 RSL – Behind the Shield New England 1 Revolution Soccer Philadelphia 2 Philadelphia Union Talk RBNY 2 Red Bulls Reader San Jose 0 San Jose Center Line Soccer Colorado 3 Undercurrent Houston 0 Soccer y Fútbol – Jose de Jesus Ortiz Los Angeles 0 LA – Official Blog Kansas City 2 Kansas City – Hillcrest Road Seattle 2 Seattle Times Chicago 1 Chicago Fire Confidential Chivas USA 1 Chicago Fire Confidential DC United 0 DCU – Steve Goff – Soccer Insider GP W D L GF GA GFA GAA PPG PTS GD Los Angeles 22 13 4 5 32 16 1.45 0.73 1.95 43 16 Columbus 22 12 5 5 31 20 1.41 0.91 1.86 41 11 Real Salt Lake 22 11 7 4 36 16 1.64 0.73 1.82 40 20 Dallas 21 9 10 2 28 17 1.33 0.81 1.76 37 11 NY Red Bull 22 11 4 7 27 23 1.23 1.05 1.68 37 4 Seattle 22 9 5 8 25 26 1.14 1.18 1.45 32 -1 Colorado 21 8 7 6 25 21 1.19 1.00 1.48 31 4 San Jose 20 8 5 7 22 22 1.10 1.10 1.45 29 0 Toronto FC 21 7 6 8 22 25 1.05 1.19 1.29 27 -3 Kansas City 21 7 5 9 21 23 1.00 1.10 1.24 26 -2 Chicago 19 6 6 7 27 28 1.42 1.47 1.26 24 -1 Houston 22 6 5 11 27 36 1.23 1.64 1.05 23 -9 Chivas USA 21 6 4 11 23 26 1.10 1.24 1.05 22 -3 New England 21 6 3 12 21 35 1.00 1.67 1.00 21 -14 Philadelphia 21 5 5 11 25 37 1.19 1.76 0.95 20 -12 DC United 22 4 3 15 15 36 0.68 1.64 0.68 15 -21
Streaking
- RSL are unbeaten in their last 21 regular season home games.
- Dallas are unbeaten in their last 12 games.
- Dallas are also unbeaten in their last 10 road games, an MLS record.
- Colorado are unbeaten in their last 6 home games.
- Houston are winless in their last 8 road games. And they’ve been scoreless in their last 4 road games.
- Seattle are unbeaten in their last 6 games.
MLS Throw Ins
- LA is the only club to have earned more than 50% of its points on the road.
- There have been 42 draws compared to 52 in ’09 thru the first 170 matches.
- There have been 106 clean sheets in the first 170 matches, counting scoreless draws as 2.
- Through 162 games: goal scoring is down around 6.0% from 2009, 2.39 vs 2.55.
- RSL has lost only twice in its last 40 home matches. They lost only once in ’08 and ’09, a feat matched by Houston.
- DC United have yielded 14 goals in the last 15 minutes.
- Dallas have not given up more than 1 goal since April 22.
- San Jose has gone from one the worst allowing late goals in ’09 to the stingiest in ’10(as a percentage of total goals allowed).
N.A. SuperLiga
The participants in the 2010 N.A. SuperLiga and their respective finishes in the last completed season are …
MLS FMF Houston 3 UNAM Pumas 4 Chicago 5 Monarchas Morelia 7 Chivas USA 6 Pachuca 8 New England 7 Puebla 13 N.A. SuperLiga Group A W D L Pts GD Houston 2 1 0 7 2 Puebla 2 0 1 6 2 Chivas USA 1 1 1 4 0 Pachuca 0 0 3 0 -5 Group B W D L Pts GD New England 3 0 0 9 3 Monarchas Morelia 1 1 1 4 3 Chicago 1 0 2 3 -4 UNAM Pumas 0 1 2 1 -2 N.A. SuperLiga Semifinals New England(1)(5) v Puebla(1)(3) Gillette Stadium, Foxborough, MA Wed, Aug 4 Houston(0) v Morelia(1) Robertson Stadium, Houston, TX Thu, Aug 5 SuperLiga after Semifinals Total Game Dates Average 2007 234,751 14 16,768 2008 186,148 14 13,296 2009 86,948 11 7,904 2010 118,298 12 9,858 3 Doubleheaders in 2009 – 2 in 2010 New England will attempt to win its 2nd SuperLiga title on Sept 1 at Gillette Stadium.
After a good showing for MLS in the first group phase matches, they pulled an oh-for four in the 2nd round.
- Aug 17 — Toronto 2 Cruz Azul 1
- Aug 18 — Columbus 1 Municipal 0
- Aug 18 — Real Salt Lake 2 Arabe Unido 1
- Aug 19 — Marathón 2 Seattle 1
- Aug 24 – Arabe Unido 1 Toronto 0
- Aug 24 – Santos Laguna 1 Columbus 0
- Aug 25 – Cruz Azul 5 Real Salt Lake 4
- Aug 25 – Seattle 0 Monterrey 2
<![CDATA[//><!]]>
Do we see a law of nature here, teams that are in the playoff hunt tend to draw better? It would appear to b the case. SJ is the only team in the playoffs spot with a down attendance but that is a team that played in a larger stadium at times last year and therefore the numbers are not true as you point out.
Given the end of summer, the end of season vacation, that baseball and football are in play, and the popular EPL is now back on TV with it’s new season one would like the numbers of people coming out to see MLS. New stadiums and a couple more DP’s should make 2011 a banner year for MLS attendance.
The “popular EPL” and increased interest in the teams that are contending don’t go together….at all.
There will always be more interest in a winner, obviously, but virtually every team was in the playoff hunt last year, where was the increased attendance there ?
I think MLS just keeps increasing in popularity, until people realize how exciting a league it is. Hopefully 2011 is a boom year, like you think.
Any of the numbers in Columbus, Dallas, Chivas, and Colorado could be improved with a bit of tongue-in-cheek:
Columbus – move stadium to downtown C-Bus, hold SSS at 15k (exp to 18-20) or move to St. Louis.
Dallas – sign DP, retro-fit playing schedule, marketing increase, or move to Mexico.
Colorado – DP and some marketing money maybe? Or replace with Arsenal.
Chivas – move to San Diego, hold SSS at 15k (exp to 18-20). No laughing on that one.
I suppose it can also be argued that there just aren’t enough dollars in peoples’ pockets to spend on tickets. But given how much cheaper they are than other sports tix, maybe this is a soft argument. Maybe interest wanes in those markets because the suburb location discourages immigrant populations from traveling to games. Maybe the sport seen as an “immigrant sport” by some xenophobes makes for decreased interest in soccer in markets where illegal immigration is a huge factor (moreso than other parts of the country), i.e Columbus, Dallas, and Denver. Chivas? I just think it was a marketing idea gone wrong. MLS doesn’t need Chivas USA. It needs a San Diego club in a small stadium.
Chivas has become the Los Angeles Clippers of the MLS. They are bad, but not terrible, and could do better for themselves with a move to San Diego. Any chance that ever happens? Who knows.
You say that Columbus is a mistake, then you say move a team to San Diego in a SSS ?
Do you really think they will find cheap real estate in San Diego to build on where people would attend ? or are you going to build in the ‘burbs with SD traffic ?
Also, I just don’t agree with the 20k stadium. Is that the end goal ?
20k ? Look where Toronto says they are, 10k waiting list for tickets.
Didn’t work very well there.
You’re right, let’s build a 30,000 seater for the Crew who can’t find 15k to fill their present stadium. Makes sense to me.
You fail either way…..but with the first you have a chance of success.
The common theme between Colorado and Dallas? Both of their stadiums are well out into the suburbs. Meanwhile, Houston’s stadium, which isn’t a fancy or modern SSS, is downtown, and so 7th in the west outdraws 3rd and 5th. The Revs have the worst of both worlds, playing in a football stadium that’s closer to Providence than Boston.
The Revolution are a joke –and I support them– they’re stadium is almost dead in the middle of Providence and Boston, I believe it is two or three miles closer to Providence than Boston. They need to pick a location in either Providence, Boston, or even Hartford and build a stadium there. Gillette is awful for the sport.
Anybody that advocates moving any club with an SSS before a team like DC just does not understand the economics of a professional sport clubs.
15k in a SSS >>> 17k in a rental.