<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MLS News from Major League Soccer Talk &#187; stadium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/tag/stadium/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com</link>
	<description>Major League Soccer Talk provides the ultimate MLS experience online.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Just another Pie-in-the-Sky MLS Stadium Proposal?</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/just-another-pie-in-the-sky-mls-stadium-proposal-6265</link>
		<comments>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/just-another-pie-in-the-sky-mls-stadium-proposal-6265#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Jonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose Earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stadium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saturday night at the annual Soccer Silicon Valley Community Foundation dinner in front of over 400 business leaders, government officials, and soccer supporters, the San Jose Earthquakes unveiled for the first time architectural illustrations of their long awaited new stadium. &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<div id="attachment_6266" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-6266" title="EarthquakesStadium" src="/media/2009/09/EarthquakesStadium2.jpg" alt="EarthquakesStadium2 Just another Pie in the Sky MLS Stadium Proposal?" width="500" height="281" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Proposed 15,000 seat San Jose Earthquakes Stadium</p></div>
<p>Saturday night at the annual Soccer Silicon Valley Community Foundation dinner in front of over 400 business leaders, government officials, and soccer supporters, the San Jose Earthquakes unveiled for the first time architectural illustrations of their long awaited new stadium. With the announcement, San Jose joins the Kansas City Wizards and the Houston Dynamo in publicly stating their intention to build the next MLS soccer-specific stadium.</p>
<p>With a seating capacity of 15,000 and additional standing and picnic areas that could boost that to nearly 20,000, the new facility would be the centerpiece of an 80 acre development near the San Jose International Airport, and a stones throw away from their current digs on the campus of Santa Clara University.</p>
<p>Moving away from a recent MLS trend toward stadiums designed with funky shaped but architecturally interesting overhangs, the new Earthquakes stadium would feature a uniformly covered horseshoe shaped tier of seating. “I think the roof structure will create intimacy and also noise,” stated Earthquakes owner Lew Wolff at the unveiling. “We’d like a lot of noise and excitement. And the fans will be closer to the pitch than any place else in the country, and the quality of the field will be outstanding.”</p>
<p>However, don’t hold your breath for the ground-breaking ceremony. Wolff has made it clear that he won’t start any construction until he has commercial sponsors that will pay for stadium naming rights and other advertising signage in and around the stadium. He also wants assurances that the financing he needs is fully in place. Of course, the final hurdle is the politics of building a stadium in the Bay Area, a region notorious for its stingy public financial outlays to sports organizations. As Wolff said somewhat tongue-in-cheek, “It is not easy getting projects done in California. In fact, I think if you came up with a cure for cancer in this state, someone would be there to oppose it.”</p>
<p>Perhaps sensing that the crowd of supporters invited to the stadium plan unveiling was growing ever frustrated at the lack of progress on the development, Wolff also announced that tickets prices for the next couple seasons would be reduced by as much as 40% from current levels. The front office knows that the team has suffered on the field since returning to MLS, and hopes this announcement will encourage the fan base to keep the faith.</p>
<p>But how long will supporters remain placated by pretty pictures and virtual stadium fly-over videos? Will lower ticket prices be enough to get fans to come out to a sub-par Buck Shaw Stadium? Fans will certainly lose interest in the organization if they don’t see ground being broken at the proposed stadium site very soon. And they certainly are not going to continue to purchase season tickets to a makeshift facility indefinitely.</p>
<p>All the momentum generated by the new stadium announcement will be lost in the community if Wolff and his associates spend an excess amount of time trying to line up all the commercial sponsors they have targeted. And an increasingly disenfranchised fan base will erode at the perceived apathy of the stadium development. What financial value there is in the franchise will fall precipitously.</p>
<p>Perhaps the best move for Wolff and the San Jose Earthquakes is to take the first step and begin development of the stadium site now. This would show fans that the team is committed to the project, giving them reason to attend games in the mean time. A full temporary facility and excess ticket demand would create a buzz in the community, which in turn would entice sponsorship by businesses looking to associate themselves with a growing professional sports organization. It might take a substantial initial investment by the Earthquakes for this to happen, but the risks of doing nothing certainly outweigh the rewards of acting now.</p>
<p><em>Carpe diem</em> Lew Wolff, don’t leave the San Jose soccer community waiting any longer.</p>
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MLS, CONCACAF botch doubleheader option</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/mls-concacaf-botch-doubleheader-option-4803</link>
		<comments>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/mls-concacaf-botch-doubleheader-option-4803#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Soccer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[champions league]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONCACAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doubleheader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guadeloupe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicaragua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro soccer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliant Stadium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports fan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stadium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Open Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Soccer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=4803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again, MLS executives prove they are not in tune with their product.  The Gold Cup provided the perfect opportunity for MLS to expand their fan base.  Collaboration with CONCACAF representatives could have brought doubleheaders featuring one MLS game and one &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.zazz.com.au/images/productsarchive/Soccer_Double_Header_image1104.jpg" alt="Soccer Double Header image1104 MLS, CONCACAF botch doubleheader option" width="350" height="280" title="MLS, CONCACAF botch doubleheader option" /></p>
<p>Once again, MLS executives prove they are not in tune with their product.  The Gold Cup provided the perfect opportunity for MLS to expand their fan base.  Collaboration with CONCACAF representatives could have brought doubleheaders featuring one MLS game and one Gold Cup game from the first game through to the final (This year’s format does provide doubleheaders, two Gold Cup games/one stadium, except for the final).  </p>
<p>A collaboration among organizations would have allowed for more stadiums to get an opportunity to host the Gold Cup, which in turn, allows more people overall to see live soccer action.  By spreading the wealth, Soccer gets more promotion and more exposure.</p>
<p>What this would have accomplished is good for both CONCACAF and for MLS.  By having an MLS game take place for fans who might not be familiar with the MLS product, there is a possibility of enhancing the significance of the CONCACAF Champions League.  Fans of different heritage would get the chance to see teams which may play in the Champions League.   </p>
<p>MLS would  have benefited by getting their product to their easiest fans to win over, soccer fans.  A game between Guadeloupe and Nicaragua in Reliant Stadium on the 9th of July with an MLS game as part of the attraction is a marketing wet dream for the Houston Dynamo.  </p>
<p>The biggest dilemma for the organizers of these events would have been which game becomes the headliner.  This is a problem you want to have.  Some may argue the MLS game may have more broad appeal than the Gold Cup game or visa versa.  Regardless, there are still two games to be played and to be enjoyed for fans. </p>
<p>There’s also the possibility of marketing to the sports fan and getting them more heavily involved.  With 2 games to see, there’s a stronger likelihood they’ll see a great game and be pulled in more to soccer as an entertainment option.  (International doubleheaders tend to attract a specific audience already familiar with Soccer). </p>
<p>Scheduling MLS games could have been made easier by getting all the teams involved during this 3 week period of 25 matches.  They could have scheduled just 25 MLS matches during this time. </p>
<p>Among the 25 matches to be slotted to accompany Gold Cup matches, another brand could also fill the void.  With sufficient planning and anticipation from U.S. Soccer and CONCACAF, some U.S. Open Cup matches could have been included. </p>
<p>It’s dissappointing this is not transpiring because it would have made for great theater and discussion for soccer fans.  It also seems that this idea would have garnered more national attention from ESPN.</p>
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.315 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-13 04:08:06 -->

