29 Responses

  1. Earl Reed
    Earl Reed
    January 21, 2011 at 3:07 pm | | Reply


    Maybe if the Qatari World Cup Organizers ask Platini to jump off a cliff, he’ll oblige.

    1. Anonymus
      Anonymus
      January 21, 2011 at 4:18 pm | | Reply


      If you read the news, you would know that this is actually hanging around since 1998, at least.

  2. dragon
    dragon
    January 21, 2011 at 3:56 pm | | Reply


    You forgot about the biggest consequence………it is doubtful whether the USA would ever host another World Cup. A January World Cup anywhere in the USA outside of South Florida, Dallas, Houston, Phoenix and LA? Doubtful.

    1. Robert Hay
      January 21, 2011 at 4:05 pm | | Reply


      If they made the scheduling permanent….yes, very very good point. Although as a US fan I am doubting we will host again anytime soon.

    2. Tim
      Tim
      January 23, 2011 at 4:16 am | | Reply


      Any domed stadium in America+SEC Stadiums+Southern NFL stadium, that’s still at ton of stadiums

  3. David
    David
    January 21, 2011 at 4:19 pm | | Reply


    And I’m sure that the IOC would be thrilled having the World Cup either just before, just after, or even during the Winter Olympics on a full time basis…I’d think maybe they’d shift things on a temporary basis (during the 2022 qualifying cycle), but not permanently….

  4. Charles
    Charles
    January 21, 2011 at 4:22 pm | | Reply


    Robert Hay…thanks for this.

    For us old guys….there isn’t much more time to get the WCup to the US, but
    they could do an all southern US WCup, easily. Very easily.
    Seattle and areas like that could be used too. Rainy and cold, but almost never freezing.

    While I like the fact that the people wanting the US to move its schedule to the snow are shown to be…well not very smart …sorry…I think this would be very stupid for Europe to move their schedule. The beauty of the European leagues that can pull off the winter schedule, is you can run all day long in that weather.
    MLS play is slower because of the heat. No doubt about it.

    1. dragon
      dragon
      January 21, 2011 at 6:16 pm | | Reply


      The US could do a southern/western World Cup but it won’t happen. NOT A CHANCE. More likely, Jack Warner and USSF will submit a pan-CONCACAF composed of south Florida, Houston, LA, Phoenix, Guadalajara, Mexico City, Kingston, Bridgetown, San Jose (CR) and maybe one or two others.

      1. The Gaffer
        The Gaffer
        January 21, 2011 at 6:53 pm | | Reply


        The 1994 World Cup was played in the sweltering heat of Florida, California and other states with temperatures soaring over 100F – so much so that it sapped the energy of players in many games and lowered the quality. Whether it’s the winter or summer, the USA can host a World Cup. The weather is never going to be perfect (either too hot or too cold), but it won’t stop the U.S. from hosting it no matter what time of the year it is.

        Cheers,
        The Gaffer

        1. dragon
          dragon
          January 21, 2011 at 10:12 pm | | Reply


          Not arguing that the USA can’t host it in the winter. They can. I am saying they won’t. Have you seen FIFA in action lately? Anything goes now. Including a pan-CONCACAF World Cup in winter. If I told you 8 years ago that Qatar would be elected to host a World Cup during the summer you would have laughed in my face. Yet here we are. It’s all about bribes and votes and influence peddling and nothing to do with where it is actually being held.

          1. Charles
            Charles
            January 22, 2011 at 2:05 pm |


            I was there in LA for the US game. It was close to 100. Not a big deal.

  5. Sancho
    Sancho
    January 21, 2011 at 5:20 pm | | Reply


    I don’t understand why this “the whole world should be in the same pace” concept.

    If you pretend to establish a 8-month schedule as it seems to be the case, just break it in two 4-month’s and add 2-month winter and summer breaks in-between. Then, if leagues would be run from February to November (with a break in June-July) or from August to May (with a brake in December-January), it wouldn’t matter!

    How hard is this?

    1. Tom
      Tom
      January 21, 2011 at 7:47 pm | | Reply


      I agree with Sancho- why does the world have to be on the same schedule? The world has different tempatures, hemispheres, and traditions- the game is played all over the world.

      Not to mention that for us fans, it is better than we have leagues on different schedules. Europe for the winter, MLS for the summer. No problem.

    2. Sancho
      Sancho
      January 21, 2011 at 8:44 pm | | Reply


      Poor portuguese speaker!

      I meant INTEND not PRETEND. Typical mistake…

      Sorry about that.

  6. Pegasus
    Pegasus
    January 21, 2011 at 5:36 pm | | Reply


    Who wouldn’t want to tour Dallas? Upper twenties this morning with frozen ground and frost on the field. My son’s high school team played a tournament game at 9:45 am and couldn’t keep from wiping out. Bet they can’t get frost or frozen fields in Europe this time of year.

  7. Arlington-MA
    Arlington-MA
    January 21, 2011 at 5:44 pm | | Reply


    FYI, the MLS would not be THE trend setter should UEFA change its schedule. That distinction would fall to the Campeonato Brasileiro, which already does this.

  8. BobbyB
    BobbyB
    January 21, 2011 at 6:14 pm | | Reply


    I don’t think this makes MLS a “trend setter” in any way. All it does is demonstrate how unbelievably shady and corrupt the whole World Cup bidding process was/is. FIFA is essentially “changing the rules” after the fact to suit a country that flat out bought the World Cup…and they clearly demonstrated (once again) their raging hypocrisy and stupidity.

  9. CoconutMonkey
    CoconutMonkey
    January 21, 2011 at 10:22 pm | | Reply


    @BobbyB: Right on, man.

    As someone who hadn’t seen Qatar’s actual bid, I think it was fair to give FIFA and Qatar the benefit of the doubt. In fact I was kind of looking forward to seeing how they’d air condition the whole country. That stuff would be on the Discovery Channel for years!

    However, asking practically all of Europe to turn their schedules upside down? Seems to me like they won’t be able to do as they promised.

    Not only that, does anyone else think that this is a bit of a slap in the face for the Russians? They just went through the trouble of flipping their schedule to a fall-spring setup just recently.

  10. vermaelen5
    vermaelen5
    January 22, 2011 at 8:05 am | | Reply


    I don’t like it one bit. I follow football from September-May and baseball from April to October, and it dovetails nicely.

  11. StateSide Soccer
    January 22, 2011 at 10:01 am | | Reply


    A bit ridiculous changing footballing tradition in the UK just to cater to the Qatari money wagon!

    That being said, there is always complaints from managers and players regarding the packed December – January schedule and calls for a ‘winter break’ have always been ignored. So, this kind of schedule certainly would have no negative impact on the, say, English league but then UEFA Cups and Champions Leagues would need re-arranged, and what about when it comes to hosting European Championships in a particularily cold country? Do we go back to running a different schedule to cater for that?!

  12. jose
    jose
    January 22, 2011 at 12:19 pm | | Reply


    being an mls fan i love the change but on the other hand i don’t want a winter world cup.

  13. GI Joe
    GI Joe
    January 22, 2011 at 1:28 pm | | Reply


    That is a hard one to sell!
    UEFA Executive Committee has 16 members:
    France (Platini): It can go either way, influenced by Spain and England
    Turkey (Erzik): No
    England (Thompson): Yes
    Spain (Llona): No
    Cyprus (Lefkaritis): No
    Malta (Mifsud): No
    Italy (Abete): No
    Slovakia (Laurinec): Yes
    Portugal (Madaíl): No
    Ukraine (Surkis): Yes
    Lithuania (Varanavicius): Yes
    Denmark (Hansen): Yes
    Israel (Luzon): No
    Romania (Sandu): It can go either way, influenced by France
    Netherlands (van Praag): It can go either way, influenced by Germany and England
    Germany (Zwanziger): Yes
    Total: No(7); Yes (6); Maybe (3)

  14. ExtraMedium
    ExtraMedium
    January 22, 2011 at 10:52 pm | | Reply


    LOL Platini. Lol. If this happens by Platini’s desired 2015 then doesn’t that mean Russia 2018 will also be a Winter World Cup? And does this mean Qatar, Saudi Arabi, Egypt, and India will play league matches June-August? A uniform calender is nice but impractical. The spring-fall schedule is fine for MLS I just wish the games had a regular day/time (*cough*fridaynight*cough*).

  15. ExtraMedium
    ExtraMedium
    January 22, 2011 at 11:17 pm | | Reply


    As far as calenders go Brazil is very interesting. Early May-Early December is the national league. Jan-April/May they have state competitions. Some states have Euro style leagues while others have conferences (playoffs are standard in both formats). Hell, Miniero has a 12 team league followed by an 8 team play-off! This format exists because Brazil is a big country with spread out population centers. I say MLS go Apertura/Clausura with teams playing regionally (easier for away fans, lower travel costs) before top 4 playoffs at the end of each stage. With 2 short regular seasons MLS becomes like the NFL in a good way.

  16. ExtraMedium
    ExtraMedium
    January 22, 2011 at 11:19 pm | | Reply


    Brazilian State Tournements:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Copa_do_Brasil#Team_information

    1. Sancho
      Sancho
      January 23, 2011 at 7:47 pm | | Reply


      I could give a lecture (or better, write an article) on Brazilian Calendar, if anyone is interested. How it works, how we get there, what are the main debates down here on the issue.

      My position about this: I’m pretty fan of Brazilian excptionalism in soccer, but there are a lot of Eurocentrics here that defend by merely copying EPL would solve all our problems…

      1. bradjmoore48
        bradjmoore48
        January 23, 2011 at 10:11 pm | | Reply


        Yes, because the EPL is God’s gift to the soccer-loving world :-/ (sarcasm)

        BTW Sancho I love your idea on the 8-month club calendar with Dec-Jan and June-July breaks for international stuff/other. To me, that’s the only way you can make a truly uniform FIFA calendar. England can stop whining and get its winter break, Italy/Spain don’t have to play in June and July in heat, and MLS can keep its spring to fall schedule no problem. Haha and Qatar can have a winter World Cup!

        I’m curious what you mean by Brazilian exceptionalism? Are you talking about how good your players are, how good your league is, or is it just in regards to the calendar?

        1. Sancho
          Sancho
          January 24, 2011 at 9:19 am | | Reply


          Brad,

          I meant a little bit of everything, but mainly the way soccer was build here, around small regional leagues and state championships. This helped to create many brazilian “schools”, with different views about how the game should be played. The “Samba Style” is ONLY ONE of them. When Scolari (2002) or Dunga (2010) Brazil teams start playing on strong defense and counter-attacks, they weren’t copy anyone. They were actually taking a typical Southern Brazilian approach, that has German and Italian influences.

          This, of course, has reflections on our calendar. The easiest way to explain for an American is doing a paralel to FBS College Football. It’s build on its Conferences and Bowls, but still there is a pressure to establish a national champion. How we deal with this pressure is another issue.
          :-)

          Best.

  17. eplnfl
    eplnfl
    January 25, 2011 at 7:53 am | | Reply


    How wonderful it is to have someone agree with US soccer for a change and not be tied to a European/English schedule because it’s always been done that way. May be another harsh winter will make England come around anyway.

    Italy and Spain will most likely have to move to a night schedule but hey this is 2010 we have lighted stadiums.

    A victory for modern times.

Leave a Reply