MLS Operating in a Vacuum

by Kartik Krishnaiyer on June 8, 2008 · 9 comments

We want this league to suc­ceed. For the future of the sport it must not only sur­vive but thrive. How­ever, as the Euro­pean Cham­pi­onships heat up, Brazil is about to face Argentina in a crit­i­cal COMNEBOL qual­i­fier, the African nations spend over a month in World Cup qual­i­fy­ing, and the home nations of MLS begin qual­i­fy­ing next week­end, the league con­tin­ues to oper­ate each and every week­end as if noth­ing else is hap­pen­ing in the world of foot­ball, and as if noth­ing else mat­ters. Not only does MLS play through World Cup qual­i­fy­ing and the Euro­pean Cham­pi­onships, but it actu­ally increases its sched­ule dur­ing this period.

MLS claims this is due to the avail­abil­ity of sta­di­ums. But the real­ity is two fac­tors come into play: one is clear­ing the mid­week sched­ule for SUM pro­moted events includ­ing Superliga, and the sec­ond is the arro­gance of a league which has never fully inte­grated in the world foot­ball com­mu­nity and whose sched­ule has in many ways turns off the very fans and com­men­ta­tors the league needs on its side to thrive.

Ivan Gazidis, a soc­cer man is now the deputy com­mis­sioner of MLS. Gazidis under­stands world foot­ball and must know the league hurts its cred­i­bil­ity when matches take place at the very same time as a US National Team match. Some very recent examples:

  • MLS had a match a year ago sched­uled to start while the CONCACAF Gold Cup Final was being played. That would be like the Ger­man Bun­desliga play­ing a match at the same start time as the Euro Finals.
  • Four days later an MLS match was on ESPN 2 while the open­ing match of the US National Team’s Copa Amer­i­can cam­paign was rel­e­gated to GOL TV, and again the matches overlapped.
  • A DC United-New Eng­land match was played last year at the very same start time as the US-Brazil friendly on a FIFA Friendly date.
  • MLS Cup 2007 was held on a FIFA black­out week­end, and in fact the US played in South Africa and Coach Bob Bradley was not able to choose any play­ers from the Hous­ton Dynamo or New Eng­land Revolution.
  • In the last week the league cham­pion Hous­ton Dynamo have had three sep­a­rate matches sched­uled on the dates of US friend­lies. In the case of the Eng­land match it was not a FIFA date so MLS can­not be faulted. But the cases of the Spain and Argentina matches make the sit­u­a­tion unac­cept­able. Why do the Dynamo have so many matches this time of year? Sim­ply because of Superliga next month. With Canada fac­ing World Cup qual­i­fy­ing the next two weeks, will Pat Onstad and Dewayne DeRossario be under pres­sure to play for the national team and then rush back to play for the Dyanmo or vise versa? This pres­sure has seem­ingly been applied to Amer­i­can play­ers as Frankie Hej­duk and Brad Guzan have both crossed over 25 time zones in the past ten days to bal­ance MLS and National Team com­mit­ments. What does this do to the human body, and to the very prod­ucts MLS mar­kets itself around?

This is only going to become a big­ger and big­ger prob­lem as we go for­ward. MLS wants to attract high cal­iber inter­na­tion­als, but if you are a player’s agent why would you send your client state­side if his club is going to have games sched­uled on the very same day as impor­tant inter­na­tional matches. More­over, how does MLS build any cred­i­bil­ity if as is the case the next two weeks games are sched­uled at the exact same time the US and Canada are play­ing do or die World Cup qualifiers?

We need to sup­port MLS, but it is dif­fi­cult to take the league com­pletely seri­ously until its sched­ul­ing prac­tices change. With the num­ber of inter­na­tion­als miss­ing, it was dif­fi­cult to dis­cern prop­erly in some cases between MLS matches and USL-1 matches this week­end. In some cases the USL-1 matches which I saw on broad­band were not only more enter­tain­ing but had a higher skill level. Already the defend­ers in USL-1 are on any given week bet­ter than the defend­ers in MLS: but this week the entire pack­age seemed bet­ter in USL-1 in many cases. Scham­bolic defend­ing is some­thing we’ve become accus­tomed to in MLS, but bad first touches and awful deci­sions on the ball while a sta­ple of any MLS match were exag­ger­ated this week­end with the num­ber of miss­ing play­ers.
Some Other Week­end Thoughts:

  • I’ll admit MLS is not very high on my pri­or­ity list while qual­i­fy­ing and the Euros take place. How­ever an effort is still being made to watch and report on every match.
  • Chivas USA played a good match in New Jer­sey Thurs­day night with Jesse Marsch once again show­ing the lead­er­ship a fairly young side needed to be competitive.
  • Juan Pablo Angel scored a nice goal but whether or not he is really worth DP money is debat­able: here is a player not good enough to play for his national team in WC qual­i­fy­ing, who doesn’t draw any new fans to the sta­dium and sim­ply put isn’t scor­ing many goals any longer. That’s the risk of the DP rule: you give a player a long term con­tract when they only have one or maybe two good years left. Expect a sim­i­lar drop off from Gal­lardo, Lopez and Beck­ham in the near future.
  • Colum­bus has now gone score­less in almost 400 min­utes and looks inept in the attack. What hap­pens going for­ward is anyone’s guess but the Crew have issues with rowdy fans, poor play and a city that seems by and large these days dis­in­ter­ested in the team. That’s a far­cry from the year Crew Sta­dium opened in 1999 when Colum­bus led the league in attendance.
  • San Jose is sur­viv­ing with­out Kei Kamara and Ivan Guer­rero which speaks very highly of the depth Frank Yal­lop and John Doyle devel­oped for an expan­sion team. Hon­duras could be gen­er­ous and let Guer­rero come back to the Quakes given the 4–0 aggre­gate lead they hold on Puerto Rico in the CONCACAF qual­i­fier, but why should they indulge the league and its sched­ul­ing habits?
  • Speak­ing of Puerto Rico, Marco Velez was sent off in the first leg against Hon­duras so he should be back with Toronto tonight for the match with the Dynamo.
  • DC United is a dif­fer­ent team with Fred caus­ing trou­ble down the left side. Even more inter­est­ing was the move to place Fred in the mid­dle of the pitch and bring Marc Burch onto the left side after the send­ing off of Marcelo Gal­lardo. A very savvy tac­ti­cal move by Tom Soehn which really helped DC grab the 3 points.
  • The Galaxy seem to be able to attack with the best even with­out Lan­don Dono­van. Alvaro Pires is prov­ing to be a smart buy and a crit­i­cal linkup player. Edson Bud­dle has had a renais­sance play­ing under Ruud Gul­lit which fur­ther proves my CSRN Amer­i­can Soc­cer Show co-host Dave Denholm’s point about Amer­i­can coach­ing: per­haps Greg Andrulis, Sigi Schmid, Bob Bradley and Mo John­ston had no clue how to use Bud­dle in a sys­tem when they had him on their squads.
GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…

No related posts.

8 comments… read them below or add one

1 Anon June 8, 2008 at 9:38 pm

Bob Bradley never coached Edson Buddle. Johnston made the trade for him. And you understand that Buddle was good before he sucked for a few years, right? And that some of his downturn had to do with his off-the-field personal problems?

And in all honesty, Angel would score more if RBNY had a decent midfield attack to speak of. If you think every other MLS team wouldn't be happy to have him, you're loonier than I thought.

Reply

2 Anon June 9, 2008 at 3:38 am

Bob Bradley never coached Edson Buddle. Johnston made the trade for him. And you understand that Buddle was good before he sucked for a few years, right? And that some of his downturn had to do with his off-the-field personal problems?

And in all honesty, Angel would score more if RBNY had a decent midfield attack to speak of. If you think every other MLS team wouldn’t be happy to have him, you’re loonier than I thought.

Reply

3 Ron (Revolt) June 9, 2008 at 9:52 am

Your column struck a cord with me. Now, I understand the MLS feels it needs to schedule matches the same weekend as when the MNT plays – you hit on those reasons above. I really wish MLS would not play on the same weekend as the MNT – and certainly not the same day. But I think I understand some of the economics why MLS does play the same weekend and even the same day.

However, MLS would be really wise to at least not play games within a four hour window of the MNT game. So if the MNT plays between, say, 4:30 and 6:30, MLS would not schedule any games that start or end between 3;30 and 7:30.

Not ideal, but better than overlapping games.

I don't understand why MLS won't do this. After all, what better what to market key MLS stars like Donovan?

Reply

4 Ron (Revolt) June 9, 2008 at 3:52 pm

Your column struck a cord with me. Now, I understand the MLS feels it needs to schedule matches the same weekend as when the MNT plays – you hit on those reasons above. I really wish MLS would not play on the same weekend as the MNT – and certainly not the same day. But I think I understand some of the economics why MLS does play the same weekend and even the same day.

However, MLS would be really wise to at least not play games within a four hour window of the MNT game. So if the MNT plays between, say, 4:30 and 6:30, MLS would not schedule any games that start or end between 3;30 and 7:30.

Not ideal, but better than overlapping games.

I don’t understand why MLS won’t do this. After all, what better what to market key MLS stars like Donovan?

Reply

5 Stan June 9, 2008 at 3:07 pm

It really rubs me wrong when people knee-jerk any perceived failing of the league as “arrogance.” Especially when it concerns a league that has had to endure existential crises just to get to the point of breaking even.

It demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of the American soccer culture, and probably some arrogance in the other direction.

To think that MLS schedules conflicts with international tournament because it thinks itself too important is naive–it would be sympathetically so, if you weren't throwing around accusations.

But in reality, any criticism of MLS scheduling must chew on and swallow the fact–and it is a fact, that MLS draws better for the decision. The league's attendance does not go down during these tournaments, it actually goes up slightly, probably due to the craving for live soccer these tourneys generate. It goes up especially in comparison to the actual alternatives, which are:
1) More midweek games
2) Playing earlier or later, in cold weather months
3) Shortening the season

A criticism that can't account for this reality and can't get past simplistic psychological explanations isn't going to stick, because at this point it hasn't made a case about bringing home the bacon.

Reply

6 Stan June 9, 2008 at 3:08 pm

As a sidenote, I can understand Ron's view of the issue, especially where it concerns the US team. When the US is not involved it's hard to argue that the Euro 2008 Final and the Galaxy-United game being an ABC double-header doesn't represent a golden opportunity.

Reply

7 Stan June 9, 2008 at 9:07 pm

It really rubs me wrong when people knee-jerk any perceived failing of the league as “arrogance.” Especially when it concerns a league that has had to endure existential crises just to get to the point of breaking even.

It demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of the American soccer culture, and probably some arrogance in the other direction.

To think that MLS schedules conflicts with international tournament because it thinks itself too important is naive–it would be sympathetically so, if you weren’t throwing around accusations.

But in reality, any criticism of MLS scheduling must chew on and swallow the fact–and it is a fact, that MLS draws better for the decision. The league’s attendance does not go down during these tournaments, it actually goes up slightly, probably due to the craving for live soccer these tourneys generate. It goes up especially in comparison to the actual alternatives, which are:
1) More midweek games
2) Playing earlier or later, in cold weather months
3) Shortening the season

A criticism that can’t account for this reality and can’t get past simplistic psychological explanations isn’t going to stick, because at this point it hasn’t made a case about bringing home the bacon.

Reply

8 Stan June 9, 2008 at 9:08 pm

As a sidenote, I can understand Ron’s view of the issue, especially where it concerns the US team. When the US is not involved it’s hard to argue that the Euro 2008 Final and the Galaxy-United game being an ABC double-header doesn’t represent a golden opportunity.

Reply

Leave a Comment

1 trackback

Previous post:

Next post: