<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MLS Needs Some Reflection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/mls-needs-some-reflection/309/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/mls-needs-some-reflection/309</link>
	<description>Daily Analysis of Major League Soccer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:08:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: J Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/mls-needs-some-reflection/309#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>J Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/mls-needs-some-reflection/309#comment-347</guid>
		<description>While some of this piece is over the top, no doubt exists that MLS is performing well below where it should be against USL sides. 

Will that change? Of course it will as MLS essentially merges with USL long term with the admission to MLS of most of the current USL-1 markets. 

I&#039;ve heard 24 MLS teams by 2013. Where do you think those teams are coming from? Thin air?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While some of this piece is over the top, no doubt exists that MLS is performing well below where it should be against USL sides. </p>
<p>Will that change? Of course it will as MLS essentially merges with USL long term with the admission to MLS of most of the current USL-1 markets. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard 24 MLS teams by 2013. Where do you think those teams are coming from? Thin air?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/mls-needs-some-reflection/309#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>J Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/mls-needs-some-reflection/309#comment-864</guid>
		<description>While some of this piece is over the top, no doubt exists that MLS is performing well below where it should be against USL sides. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will that change? Of course it will as MLS essentially merges with USL long term with the admission to MLS of most of the current USL-1 markets. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve heard 24 MLS teams by 2013. Where do you think those teams are coming from? Thin air?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While some of this piece is over the top, no doubt exists that MLS is performing well below where it should be against USL sides. </p>
<p>Will that change? Of course it will as MLS essentially merges with USL long term with the admission to MLS of most of the current USL-1 markets. </p>
<p>I&#39;ve heard 24 MLS teams by 2013. Where do you think those teams are coming from? Thin air?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
