41 Responses

  1. Will Rimer
    May 23, 2011 at 9:16 pm | | Reply


    I’m very upset and surprised Timmy Chandler wasn’t included. I think this would’ve been a great time to see what he could do. Maybe a little too early, but we need to learn what role he could play in Brazil. And our D isn’t getting any younger. I guess young defenders were included, but still I wanted Chandler on the roster.

    1. Alan
      Alan
      May 23, 2011 at 10:07 pm | | Reply


      Chandler would have been a great choice. Too bad he wasn’t called.

      1. Abram
        May 24, 2011 at 5:54 am | | Reply


        I’m trying to find the article, but apparently Bradley did call Chandler. Apparently Neurenberg did not want him to play because he was injured and they are playing during the Gold Cup (or something like that). So I give Bradley a pass on that one since he had no control over Chandler’s ability to play for the NT. I do however question why neither Gomez nor Bunbury was brought in though.

  2. SJQuakesFan
    SJQuakesFan
    May 23, 2011 at 9:48 pm | | Reply


    Dempsey and Donovan should serve as servicemen to Wondo as the targetman. If the formula works than they will score no doubt. Don’t know Altidore is in shape to do the same.

    1. Matt
      Matt
      May 24, 2011 at 12:28 pm | | Reply


      This is a 2 week tournament that the we have a good shot at winning. It hopefully will be a US v Mexico final. This is another step in the developement of the over all program and I am certainly pleased with the direction it is going in. Donovan and Dempsy are the glue (along with Howard, and I am omitting Gooch on purpose) of the team. The roster can’t be loaded with young players with little national team experience. For the most part this team has had a lot of training time together. Would I like to see Chandler or some of the other up and commers? Sure. But there time will come and they will start getting a lot more caps in friendlies in the near future. US Soccer has come so far in the past 2 years. Hopefully it will evolve at the same pace and Donovan and Dempsy will be able to really taste some success before their careers are over with the National Team. I have tickets to the Canada game and can’t wait to see the evolution. Can’t wait for the Spain game too.

  3. Abram
    May 23, 2011 at 9:52 pm | | Reply


    Despite no Bunbury, Chandler, or Diskerud this is a pretty forward thinking squad (though I would have left off Kljestan). I’m also not too sure with calling up Rimando as a third choice keeper in the heart of the MLS season. Still no one is ever going to be perfectly happy with a team, but overall I give Bradley’s choices a solid “B+”. Chandler, Bunbury, and Diskerud will be seen in the future. BTW, do you think Canadian’s are gloating over Bunbury’s exclusion? Just wondering.

    1. Alan
      Alan
      May 23, 2011 at 10:12 pm | | Reply


      Bunbury will get included in the future I am sure. He is a part of the future. Rimando has been awesome as a keeper and deserves a chance. I think anyone getting taken out during the season is too bad, and MLS should definitely work around the international calendar to allow talents like him to get called without hurting his squad.

      1. Abram
        May 23, 2011 at 10:15 pm | | Reply


        I agree, MLS really does need to respect the international dates, but it is hard with the summer schedule. Losing Rimando is a HUGE deal in RSL. I honestly think he is a bigger loss to RSL than Donovan is to LA and it is a shame that RSL loses their first-choice keeper so that he can be the third-choice keeper on the NT, when David Yelldell’s season is over.

        1. Alan
          Alan
          May 23, 2011 at 10:18 pm | | Reply


          Definitely a good point. Maybe during the off-season for MLS would be a better time to give him a chance. I’m a bit torn.

          1. Adam G
            Adam G
            May 27, 2011 at 1:41 pm |


            Rimando won’t actually be going to the gold cup unless one of the US keepers get’s injured.

            This is on Realsaltlake.com:
            “And finally, Nick Rimando will serve as the third goalkeeper for the US squad. He will not be required to miss action with RSL, however, barring an injury or unforeseen event that would keep Tim Howard or Marcus Hahnemann from filling their role in the US goal.”

  4. Alan
    Alan
    May 23, 2011 at 10:22 pm | | Reply


    I am glad Freddy Adu was given a chance and even more happy that Wondolowski was given a second chance. I can’t wait to see what formation he plans to use.

  5. Alan
    Alan
    May 23, 2011 at 10:24 pm | | Reply


    Oh, and a side note. I am going to the US/Canada game at Ford Field in Detroit. I am beyond excited for this!

    1. Charles
      Charles
      May 24, 2011 at 9:30 am | | Reply


      That is awesome. US should score some goals for that one.

  6. Lars
    Lars
    May 24, 2011 at 12:43 am | | Reply


    Glad to see Bunbury was appropriately awarded for his choice to betray the first international country he chose to represent. He was so proud to be Canadian he jumped to the US at the first chance so he could get those sponsorship dollars. Seems his choice has really worked out for him.

    Good job Teal. At least your father wasn’t a sell-out.

  7. Abram
    May 24, 2011 at 5:57 am | | Reply


    So then I guess Canadians will be gloating over his exclusion. Blackburn’s Junior Hoilett, also a Canadian, has recently said he is interested in playing for the US as well. I wish Canadians would stay playing for Canada, because it would make it so there were three really strong CONCACAF teams.

    1. Lars
      Lars
      May 24, 2011 at 12:14 pm | | Reply


      Hoilett actually has no claim to playing for the US. He’s not eligible at all. He just wants to play for a big country, which is why he’s still holding out for his UK residency.

      1. Abram
        May 24, 2011 at 1:32 pm | | Reply


        I didn’t think he could play for the US. Canada really should have a team that is on par with the US. I am not Canadian, but would love to see their team be strong. Having Mexico, the US, and Canada as strong teams would be good for all three and great for the CONCACAF region. Do you know if Canada even tried to call Hoilett for the Gold Cup? They really should have if they didn’t.

        1. Lars
          Lars
          May 30, 2011 at 2:46 pm | | Reply


          They’ve been in contact with Hoilett. He keeps declining the call up. He wants to play for England.

  8. Earl Reed
    Earl Reed
    May 24, 2011 at 9:28 am | | Reply


    Honestly, I don’t see the Norwegian league games. I don’t know if Diskerud is that impressive or not. He had a pass in a friendly that found Agudelo for a goal. In 8 games for Stabaek this year he has zero goals. And he’s playing primarily as a right midfielder.

    At this point, Diskerud was kind of a trendy, youth favorite. If he’s not getting time in a central attacking midfield role at Stabaek, then he doesn’t have a niche to fill. We have Donovan, Dempsey, Kljestan, and Rogers who are all more accomplished to play the wings. And Donovan can play CAM if Bradley wants to play a single striker formation.

  9. Charles
    Charles
    May 24, 2011 at 9:34 am | | Reply


    I have no idea how good Adu is, very hard to follow leagues like the 2nd division in Turkey.

    I am happy he makes it because on many other sites he has become the butt of jokes by other guys that can’t follow the 2nd division in Turkey, but want to act like they know more than they do.

    IF I didn’t know better I would say there were a LOT of players that could have made this team, but were not chosen. That can’t be of course because US soccer stinks….

  10. Robert
    Robert
    May 24, 2011 at 10:41 am | | Reply


    I believe Mexico is the favorite to win the Gold Cup. I just looked at their roster for Copa America and Mexico is going to be a dominate force for many years, pending everyone stays healthy.

    As for USA I’m not seeing to many bright spots from our younger crop. It’s sad to see our prospects bounce around from club to club and struggle for minutes.

  11. SSReporters
    May 24, 2011 at 11:29 am | | Reply


    No Robbie Findley?

    BOB HAS SEEN THE LIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    1. Alan
      Alan
      May 25, 2011 at 3:22 am | | Reply


      Yeah, I never understood that one neither.

      1. Abram
        May 25, 2011 at 1:39 pm | | Reply


        …but he’s really, really fast. What’s not to get?

  12. Alex
    Alex
    May 24, 2011 at 11:46 am | | Reply


    Timmy Chandler and Bunbury are two players i would love to see in the roster. especially chandler. i dont even see him on the player pool on USSF website. but i have a feeling he’ll get a call up come qualification rounds. two players im really excitied about or three actually are jermaine jones, wondo and agudelo. jones and wondo are two tough players who i fell will give strength to the attack and agudelo i feel can be very useful as a sub for either player, he’s got alot of speed to resupply the squad but i dont think he should be a starter, not yet at least. but im excited to see USA vs Panama in Tampa!!!!

    anyways i think just as it did with Australia, Japan and the US, i think canada needs their own professional league or at least a more professional version of their first division in order to bring up their national squad. im eager to see them play this year see how much the canucks has improved.

    1. Abram
      May 24, 2011 at 1:38 pm | | Reply


      Apparently Nurnberg asked Bradley to leave Chandler off because of injury. Same fo SKC and Bunbury. I’ll be interested to see how Wondo does at this level.

  13. Tuttle
    Tuttle
    May 24, 2011 at 12:26 pm | | Reply


    Have we just given up on developing a quality left back?

    Lichaj should be able to cover the right in Chandler’s absence, but no Zach Loyd or Brek Shae means Bocanegra or Bornstein are probably going to play on the left and they don’t really have the pace to play the position in a modern formation. Spector is an option and has the pace, but he lacks the marking ability needed (which is why his club plays him in midfield).

    1. Charles
      Charles
      May 24, 2011 at 1:25 pm | | Reply


      Who did you have in mind ?

      1. Tuttle
        Tuttle
        May 25, 2011 at 9:55 am | | Reply


        Zach Loyd or Brek Shae. Perhaps Kevin Alston, although he prefers the right, or Ike Opera who the athleticism necessary for the role even though he usually plays in the middle.

        1. Tuttle
          Tuttle
          May 25, 2011 at 10:03 am | | Reply


          “… who *has* the athleticism …”

          Oi. Need more coffee before posting.

        2. Charles
          Charles
          May 26, 2011 at 3:09 pm | | Reply


          Well I can testify first hand the Brek Shae looks good in left mid. Many think the same about Lloyd too.

        3. Abram
          May 26, 2011 at 3:45 pm | | Reply


          I watch Alston week in and week out with the Revs, and I just don’t see him being able to succesfully transition to the USMNT. Maybe I’m missing something. I was a bit disappointed that Shea wasn’t on the squad. I’m curious about his future as a left back.

  14. Dave C
    Dave C
    May 24, 2011 at 1:30 pm | | Reply


    Not sure I’d agree with Adu being “physically athletic”. Isn’t he about 4 feet tall???

    1. Abram
      May 24, 2011 at 1:40 pm | | Reply


      Athletic does not necesarilly mean tall. Messi (and I am definitely not comparing Adu to Messi) is only 5’7″ or so. I sort of believe that Adu is a placeholder until Stuart Holden in back to health.

      1. Dave C
        Dave C
        May 25, 2011 at 12:04 pm | | Reply


        Abram, I actually agree with you. I just assumed that Robert Hay was using the phrase the way many Americans often do (which usually means tall, strong and fast, like an NFL receiver), which obviously doesn’t apply to Adu.

        This common American misuse of the term “athletic” is why I get particularly mad when Americans say things like “the US would be awesome at soccer if only our best athletes played soccer instead of NFL/Basketball etc”. It’s like they neglect the fact that there are different types of athleticism, each of which is more suited to some sports than others.

  15. CrazyMike366
    CrazyMike366
    May 24, 2011 at 1:46 pm | | Reply


    A couple of corrections here:

    The Allsvenkan and most Scandinavian leagues run a schedule parallel to MLS, not Europe, because of the winters. Bedoya and Mixx would be missing a fair number of league games. Bedoya, being in his last contract year, probably decided that would be a bad career choice. Bradley made a statement that supported it was a ‘club v country’ problem for the Scandinavia-based players.

    Chandler was called up but was convinced not to participate by Nuremburg. It was his first full season of top level play and he has claimed he is both physically and mentally exhausted and would be happy to take the summer off to come back fit and ready for the winter camp. This has the knock on benefit of simultaneously showing his club team that he is committed to them and wants to keep his starting spot.

    My own reactions:

    I am glad Adu got the call up. I’ve been watching him this season and want to see him do well…he’s the same age as me so I’ve always felt linked to him moreso than some of the older players on the national team. I watched his games this season on crap internet feeds and I was impressed. Anyone who is upset that Bedoya didn’t come home for the cup should have been equally upset had Adu not been called in – they’re both at 4 goals and as many assists in about the same number of games.

    The other ones that are drawing reactions that leave me seething a bit are Wondo over Bunbury and Rogers over any other US winger in MLS. Look at the stats – they’re doing very very well. Wondo has the most goals from open play of any US striker in MLS (Bunbury is hot and cold) and Rogers is listed in the Castrol/EA/Opta index as about 12% more effective on the ball than Landon Donovan, and no one is screaming about him being included.

    1. Earl Reed
      Earl Reed
      May 25, 2011 at 7:21 am | | Reply


      Yep, you’re right, thus the reason that they’ve left out Donovan, DeMerit, Agudelo, and Wondolowski.

      Oh wait.

      Let me interpret: “Bedoya and Diskerud are young players who are not up to quality at the moment. But I can’t say that, so I’ll use the spring-fall Scandinavian schedule as a convenient excuse.”

  16. Oliver
    Oliver
    May 25, 2011 at 3:47 pm | | Reply


    It’s a brilliant move on Bradley part. Adu, Altidore, M. Bradley, and Rogers have went through the US MNT system together. They’ve developed years of chemistry. Back in 2007, they almost won the U-20′s World Cup. BRILLIANT!!! Well done, Bob!!!

  17. gnot feklar
    gnot feklar
    May 25, 2011 at 5:24 pm | | Reply


    Torres midfield plays in mexican leauge what happend to him?

    1. Abram
      May 26, 2011 at 3:47 pm | | Reply


      I’m really upset about Torres and Gomez not being included. Both seem to be playing well, but neither seems to be really on Bradley’s radar. I was listening to someone who was mentioning that Torres, Diskerud, and Adu (supposedly the more creative players) have trouble fitting into Bradley’s system because he is overly tactical. I don’t know if that is true, but it is an interesting thought.

      1. gnotfeklar
        gnotfeklar
        May 26, 2011 at 6:16 pm | | Reply


        thanx enjoy your comments

Leave a Reply