6 Responses

  1. Mark
    Mark
    June 28, 2010 at 10:59 am | | Reply


    good points, although you fail to address the elephant in the room: Bob Bradley. Does Bradley stay because he won the ’07 Gold Cup, finished first in Concacaf qualifying, 2nd in the Confed and won group C or does he go because he consistently got his team selections wrong at this tournament leading him to waste substitutions early, failed to learn from those mistakes and was unable to get the team to stay focused at the start of games? If he goes, then who comes in for the next 4 year cycle?

    Also Goodson is 4 days younger than Gooch. Both are 28, so I doubt Goodson will be part of a new look back line. Spector is more likely to move to CB with Simek stepping in at RB. That still leaves Bornstein at LB. He played OK in the two latter games but he’s still a catastrophe waiting to happen. The biggest concern is the lack of players coming through at forward. Either Jozy needs to develop the ability to lead the line alone so we can play 4-5-1 / 4-2-3-1 or Findley and Adu will need to come on leaps and bounds and Davies to get fully healthy and continue on the trajectory he was on before the wreck.

  2. Cavan
    Cavan
    June 28, 2010 at 11:56 am | | Reply


    Good article with an honest analysis. I completely agree that our national team is now clearly a 2nd tier team internationally. I think it’s fair that the best teams regard them as dangerous to play against but also inconsistent. All accurate assessments based on what they’ve shown on the field. A round of 16 finish is very respectable by any standard.

    I think it’s also fair to say that the loss to Ghana was a missed opportunity. However, I think that we should focus on having our team get good enough so they don’t worry about the draw and see a team like Argentina as beatable rather than a long shot. I also think this World Cup was a step forward in that they made it to the knockout round by taking care of business rather than backing in like in 1994 and 2002.

  3. Paul
    Paul
    June 28, 2010 at 1:30 pm | | Reply


    Damn good post. Says everything that should be said about where the US national program is, our future, the lost opportunity of this Cup, ect. We are a rising top 16 team in the world. The burning question: how do we advance from where we are now? How does the national head coach enter into this? Is Bradley the right person for the future?

  4. Charles
    Charles
    June 28, 2010 at 2:22 pm | | Reply


    I agree…sort of.

    We are still on the verge of not making the final 16, as oppossed to other second tier teams. As opposed to Mexico, England ( when they qualify ), who always make it to the second round.
    Needing South Korea to beat Portugal or very last second goals taking us to the second round in two out of last four World Cups, the other being “didn’t make it” years.

    I do think that we will or have passed those teams and perhaps this will be the year we remember. England finishing second in our group after a tie game with them.

  5. golandongo
    golandongo
    June 28, 2010 at 7:09 pm | | Reply


    Eric,
    thanks for writing an even handed appraisal of the USMNT minus the anger, vitriol, spite and general hatred of one writer on this blog. Dylan Thomas call your office, this is how you write a good and fair appraisal with out coming across as a slavish acolyte or a bitter spiteful crumudgeon.

  6. Lloyd
    Lloyd
    June 28, 2010 at 9:45 pm | | Reply


    Refreshing and spot-on the mark with this post. I said I would be proud of my beloved USMNT as long as we left our hearts on the field. Despite our negatives I have Big hopes for our future. Can’t wait for the Gold Cup!!!

Leave a Reply