<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Final MLS Table</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773</link>
	<description>Daily Analysis of Major League Soccer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:56:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010-2011 CONCACAF Champions League</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773#comment-24533</link>
		<dc:creator>2010-2011 CONCACAF Champions League</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6773#comment-24533</guid>
		<description>So now begins the final round of games to determine the final 2 USA participants for the 10-11 CCL.  Good luck to all teams involved.

It does seem that the Galaxy will be hungry to be CCL Champions.  It will be good.

Long live club football.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now begins the final round of games to determine the final 2 USA participants for the 10-11 CCL.  Good luck to all teams involved.</p>
<p>It does seem that the Galaxy will be hungry to be CCL Champions.  It will be good.</p>
<p>Long live club football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773#comment-24512</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6773#comment-24512</guid>
		<description>Houston isn&#039;t dreading the trip to Seattle.  This is the match up we wanted.  They are they only team we haven&#039;t beaten and we intend to do so.  Show them up in their own house then bring them back to Houston and finish them off in front of 6th straight playoff sellout of orange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Houston isn&#8217;t dreading the trip to Seattle.  This is the match up we wanted.  They are they only team we haven&#8217;t beaten and we intend to do so.  Show them up in their own house then bring them back to Houston and finish them off in front of 6th straight playoff sellout of orange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LI Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773#comment-24501</link>
		<dc:creator>LI Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6773#comment-24501</guid>
		<description>DC follows up their back-to-back Supporters&#039; Shield seasons with back-to-back non-playoff seasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC follows up their back-to-back Supporters&#8217; Shield seasons with back-to-back non-playoff seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773#comment-24500</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6773#comment-24500</guid>
		<description>Charles, if you play everyone twice in an 18 team league, that is only 34 games, because you don&#039;t play yourself.  Even if they stay on the 30 game schedule - meaning every team will have 4 oppenents they just play once, and twelve oppenents they play twice (home and away, presumably)- they should still do single table.  In our current conference set-up the schedules are not the same for teams within a conference.  The western teams, for example, played a 3rd game against just 2 of the 8 teams in the conference.  I don&#039;t see a big difference between unbalanced conference schedules and unbalanced single table schedules, but I do know this playoff chase would have been a lot easier for causal fans to understand the MLS had used single table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, if you play everyone twice in an 18 team league, that is only 34 games, because you don&#8217;t play yourself.  Even if they stay on the 30 game schedule &#8211; meaning every team will have 4 oppenents they just play once, and twelve oppenents they play twice (home and away, presumably)- they should still do single table.  In our current conference set-up the schedules are not the same for teams within a conference.  The western teams, for example, played a 3rd game against just 2 of the 8 teams in the conference.  I don&#8217;t see a big difference between unbalanced conference schedules and unbalanced single table schedules, but I do know this playoff chase would have been a lot easier for causal fans to understand the MLS had used single table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCUDiplomat96</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773#comment-24480</link>
		<dc:creator>DCUDiplomat96</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6773#comment-24480</guid>
		<description>Lets see if Columbus can win Back to back league titles??!!! the SS Choke Bug is on them again, are they the New dynasty??? who knows</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets see if Columbus can win Back to back league titles??!!! the SS Choke Bug is on them again, are they the New dynasty??? who knows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773#comment-24474</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6773#comment-24474</guid>
		<description>LA-Chivas and Houston-Seattle would not have happened in a single conference, and all of those are going to be great.
Single conference is VERY short sighted.  Are they going to have 36 games in two years ?  IF not, what have a single conference for one year ?  After that are they going to grow at all ?  IF so, single conference means having more games every year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LA-Chivas and Houston-Seattle would not have happened in a single conference, and all of those are going to be great.<br />
Single conference is VERY short sighted.  Are they going to have 36 games in two years ?  IF not, what have a single conference for one year ?  After that are they going to grow at all ?  IF so, single conference means having more games every year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773#comment-24471</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6773#comment-24471</guid>
		<description>well I got the two dream west match-ups, DALE DYNAMO.


shame TFC and DC didn&#039;t make it in, oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well I got the two dream west match-ups, DALE DYNAMO.</p>
<p>shame TFC and DC didn&#8217;t make it in, oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773#comment-24470</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6773#comment-24470</guid>
		<description>Single table with play-offs would be great- more fair and easier to follow.  However, LA-Chivas would not have happened this year, and that series is the one to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single table with play-offs would be great- more fair and easier to follow.  However, LA-Chivas would not have happened this year, and that series is the one to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773#comment-24469</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6773#comment-24469</guid>
		<description>but still Keeper is a tough position your the last line of defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but still Keeper is a tough position your the last line of defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/final-mls-table/6773#comment-24467</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/?p=6773#comment-24467</guid>
		<description>Technically she&#039;s right.  Goalie is a stupid term to use in football.  Any time i hear somebody call a Keeper a Goalie I want to punch them in the teeth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically she&#8217;s right.  Goalie is a stupid term to use in football.  Any time i hear somebody call a Keeper a Goalie I want to punch them in the teeth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
