Don Garber Speaks: Thoughts

by Kartik Krishnaiyer on November 22, 2008 · 4 comments


 blanco becks Don Garber Speaks: Thoughts

Don Gar­ber as always has been con­duct­ing a major charm offen­sive as MLS Cup approaches. But as some­one who has watched the league since its incep­tion I’ve become numb or even totally immune to the league’s pro­pa­ganda. MLS the way I see it has prob­lems and has not deliv­ered the prod­uct promised to fans of foot­ball in North Amer­i­can upon its incep­tion. How­ever even I can be taken in by the Don at times and do find some of his sug­ges­tions for the future encour­ag­ing. Here are some thoughts:

Mon­treal with­draws from MLS expan­sion race

I fully expected this as Joey Saputo in the past has ques­tioned the $40 mil­lion expan­sion fee asked by MLS con­sid­er­ing his cur­rent USL side the Mon­treal Impact sells out its games and has advanced to the quar­ter­fi­nals of the CONCACAF Cham­pi­ons League with­out spend­ing $40 mil­lion. This deci­sion leaves USL viable for the near future. I had pub­li­cally stated that USL can afford to lose mar­kets like Atlanta (which has now sus­pended oper­a­tions), Miami, Port­land and even Van­cou­ver. But the league would be in seri­ous jeop­ardy of col­laps­ing if it lost Mon­treal which is many ways is the anchor fran­chise of the league and has increased the league’s pres­tige by per­form­ing so well in the CONCACAF Cham­pi­ons League. While MLS will still have two new teams in good mar­kets, the unstated goal of MLS to put USL out of busi­ness has failed for this round. USL’s expan­sion to Tampa and Phoenix should com­pletely erase any detri­men­tal affects of los­ing weak fran­chises in Miami and Atlanta. Port­land is a strong fran­chise in USL but with Mon­treal hang­ing around USL can absorb the blow of los­ing Port­land as well.

 No more reserve teams.

Again I don’t under­stand this deci­sion. I thought the reserve leagues were a major step for­ward for MLS a few years ago. I agree that expand­ing the senior ros­ter is crit­i­cal. How­ever with­out reserve team setups the league resem­bles more of a pro­fes­sional sports league in the US than a proper foot­balling league. It’s no won­der more and more young Amer­i­can play­ers are seek­ing careers in Europe or even in more remote foot­ball leagues. MLS is not com­mit­ted to player devel­op­ment in 2008 the way it was in 2001 or 2004.

Con­fer­ence play will continue

I’m happy with this deci­sion. The advo­cates of sin­gle table foot­ball do not seem to want to acknowl­edge the geo­graphic dif­fi­culty of pulling this off in the US. The USL keeps a sin­gle table which leads to some very ugly sched­ul­ing and incred­i­ble fix­ture con­ges­tion. Sched­ul­ing in a region as large as North Amer­ica must be based on geog­ra­phy and com­mon sense and not on the desires of fans of Euro­pean football.

 Play­offs will continue

This is a no brainer as the play­offs pro­vide the most excite­ment in what is an oth­er­wise dif­fi­cult foot­ball league to watch. How­ever, the tim­ing of the play­offs must be moved to not con­flict with a con­gested period on the Amer­i­can sport­ing cal­en­dar head on.

No deal on Dono­van yet

Con­trary to reports in the Ger­man press, Lan­don Dono­van has not been sold or loaned for­mally to FC Bay­ern yet. How­ever MLS must sell Dono­van, because he clearly is ready to move on and he among Amer­i­can foot­ballers of his gen­er­a­tion has stuck by MLS longer than any other player.

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…

4 comments… read them below or add one

1 undrafted November 22, 2008 at 1:46 pm

Here's my take on the reasoning behind the demise of the reserve league. It was clear that MLS teams didn't have sufficient depth in proven players. Expanding the senior roster by 2 spots is a long overdue move. But that comes at some cost. With an upcoming CBA renegotiation next year and an incredibly tough sponsorship market, Garber wasn't getting any approval to suddenly up player expenses. The reserve league is nice in theory, but in reality it was full of guest players that wouldn't start at a good NCAA program. MLS was getting bad press for paying guys 12k/yr, even though they were glorified trialists, most of whom wouldn't get higher pay playing elsewhere. It's still to be seen if MLS axed the 12k/yr spots or the 17k/yr spots, but regardless they funded better proven depth by axing marginal 23 year old talent. Guys that 95% of the time are never going to be good MLS players. The cost of this move was the reserve league. MLS teams are starting to invest in youth programs (14-18 year olds). It'd be great to fund both but MLS decided it had to make a choice. Now the development of marginal college grads fall to the USL, their likely permanent home.

Let's hope for more loans to USL, more PDL clubs, and deliverance on the promises of real youth programs.

Do you have that original MLS promise in writing? And why did they make it way back at the inception of North America? :)

Reply

2 BishopvilleRed November 22, 2008 at 2:45 pm

KK – I also heard MLS will recognize and suspend operations over FIFA international dates. FINALLY! It's insane to expect fans to pay top dollar to watch clearly substandard sides.

Garber also declared that teams can play Superliga or CONCACAF Champs League, not both. Logical, considering the dissolving of the reserve league

I agree with our point on the reserve league. Opportunity lost. I see the points UNDRAFTED raises, but I think this is a step backwards. Football-wise, reserves league seems a logical step as a building block with youth programs and academies. Business-wise, an internal contraction looks like a short-sighted cost-cutting measure.

SB

Reply

3 undrafted November 22, 2008 at 2:58 pm

I agree the reserve league is a step back, but not much of one since MLS wasn't anywhere close to getting the reserve league right. It wasn't full of real prospects. And it wasn't in the pyramid.

I wouldn't count on MLS obersving all FIFA dates. Hopefully they'll be able to observe some. Given how tough it is to draw fans midweek or play in most markets before mid-March, there's only so much MLS can do. I'd suggest a rule that they suspend for any date when the USMNT plays a competitive match, during the Gold Cup, and during the World Cup. I think it's self-defeating to play through those. Next year 11 of 15 teams will play in stadiums controlled by someone with a stake in MLS. It's time to start making some changes, but of course they'll probably blame the economy for keeping the status quo. I'll get over it as long as they make clear they recognize the ultimate goal of bette recognizing international dates.

Reply

4 Chris November 22, 2008 at 6:52 pm

Here's what the pro-east-west conference people don't seem to comprehend…..MLS teams already play every other team twice, one home, one away. The only difference between what they do now and a single table is that MLS teams currently play each team in thier conferences 3 times. Someone explain to me how dropping the 3rd conference game and organizing as a single table is more travel?? Duh – its not. Let's stop using the travel excuse as a reason not to adopt the single table. It's lame and everyone can see right through it.

Now next year there will be 15 teams. A single table would produce only 28 games. So maybe it might be worth waiting until 2010 when philly joins then it would be 30 games. But please don't give me the travel excuse….it would not cost a dime more than it does now.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: