Beckham Circus Hurting MLS

by Kartik Krishnaiyer on August 5, 2007 · 3 comments

schelotto 739663 Beckham Circus Hurting MLS Schelotto/ AP

Major League Soc­cer in many ways has got­ten what it asked for when it signed David Beck­ham to a ridicu­lous con­tract in Jan­u­ary. By mak­ing the league appear des­per­ate for a sav­ior when it need not have, rear­rang­ing the sched­ule to show­case Beck­ham and mak­ing one of its worst teams the sym­bol of the league abroad, MLS has appeared to this point to strike out on all three counts. That’s a pity because this sea­son from a qual­ity of play stand­point has been the best in the his­tory of the league. Con­trary to the spin that comes from the league, the level of play has NOT con­sis­tently improved through­out the twelve years of MLS’ exis­tence. In fact I would strongly argue the league’s play was of a much higher stan­dard in 2000 than in 2005. Not only do I believe that is the case, but results of MLS clubs in inter­na­tional com­pe­ti­tions and in friend­lies ver­sus clubs from big­ger and more pres­ti­gious leagues bears out that reality.

Despite its blus­ter about con­stant improve­ment in the league, I sus­pect Don Gar­ber and the brass of MLS real­ized that they had to make great strides in 2007, espe­cially fol­low­ing the fash­ion­able bash­ing of MLS in the press after the US bowed out of World Cup 2006 with just one draw and two losses. MLS made the moves it had to acquir­ing qual­ity inter­na­tion­als like Juan Toja, Pablo Richetti, Guillermo Baros Sch­e­lotto, Cuauhte­moc Blanco, Paulo Wan­chope, Luciano Emilio, Fred, Juan Pablo Angel, Car­los Marinelli and Abel Xavier this sea­son. These sign­ings are a big rea­son why MLS 2007 has been a plea­sure to watch, and the afore­men­tioned names rep­re­sent the best col­lec­tive group of inter­na­tional sign­ings by MLS since at least 2000, and per­haps ever in the league’s his­tory. This is in addi­tion to the Superliga Tour­na­ment which show­cased MLS’ clubs in an ultra com­pet­i­tive inter­na­tional com­pe­ti­tion where the league’s clubs more than passed the test of demon­strat­ing the qual­ity of MLS in 2007. Addi­tion­ally, the league is in bet­ter finan­cial stand­ing than ever before, with a lucra­tive TV con­tract (nego­ti­ated before David Beck­ham signed) and more and more Soc­cer spe­cific sta­di­ums being erected around the league.

But in a major mar­ket­ing folly, based once again on win­ning accep­tance with the anti soc­cer sports estab­lish­ment rather than win­ning respect and accep­tance among Latino and Euro­pean soc­cer fans in the US, the MLS has put every­thing on Beck­ham. That’s too much for one player to bur­den, albeit a world class player of unmatched pro­fes­sion­al­ism and per­sonal char­ac­ter like David Beck­ham. Nor is it fair, con­sid­er­ing MLS has done what it had to do in order to improve its prod­uct with or with­out David Beck­ham. Now with Beck­ham injured and not play­ing in front of sold out sta­di­ums on the road, MLS has become a laugh­ing stock and has given addi­tional fod­der to the anti soc­cer sports media estab­lish­ment who bashed Beck­ham (with­out know­ing any­thing about the man him­self) and MLS with the pre­ci­sion of well planned air strike on a defense­less city. By mak­ing Beck­ham, and not the ulti­mate improve­ment of the league the issue, MLS has helped to dig its own grave with the US Sports snob establishment.

David Beck­ham ulti­mately will play and con­tribute to the con­tin­ued improve­ment in the league’s qual­ity. But the cir­cus atmos­phere that sur­rounded his arrival and the way his sign­ing way han­dled by Major League Soc­cer ulti­mately has been coun­ter­pro­duc­tive to the con­tin­ued growth of the league and the sport in the United States.

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…

3 comments… read them below or add one

1 Bonji August 6, 2007 at 2:59 pm

Without Beckham playing in a league game, MLS merchandise sales are up 300% and they have sold over 300,000 Beckham jerseys. I doubt the league agrees with this article.

Reply

2 The Manly Ferry August 6, 2007 at 10:13 pm

I’m going the same way as Kartik. Short-term revenue gains are swell, but they’re neither permanent nor stable. Reducing the entire league to the role of a supporting cast for one player does the disservice of sullying the central product – e.g. MLS itself.

The above may be more intuitive than scientific, but stoking the perception that One Great Player graced a league of barely-competent players, and moving the schedule around to reinforce the impression, doesn’t do much to build the brand.

Reply

3 Joe Ginto August 8, 2007 at 3:45 am

i disagree with the premise that the beckham effect has had a “less-than-salutary effect of cheapening the rest of the league.” aeg knew what it was getting, though they obviously weren’t banking on an injury. mls needed to back up this signing with all their weight and espn is…well, espn. seen the barry bonds home run chase? they can’t help but be overbearing.

espn and mls are joined together for better or worse. the partnership will improve the popularity of the sport. how it goes about attaining that goal is where i believe football fans will take exception.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: