18 Responses

  1. Philip
    Philip
    December 30, 2008 at 10:39 am | | Reply


    hey why not just take the goalie out altogether, in fact lets take a few players off each team and we can have 12-9 scores or 10-8, it may not resemble football at all but we can still call it that. Have you ever seen the passion of the fans when a team scores? Do you really think that would be happenning if we had these ridiculous scores? If someones attention span doesn't allow them to watch a game that doesnt have basketball scores then i feel for them, as for changing the game, not a cance in hell.

  2. firefan
    firefan
    December 30, 2008 at 12:04 pm | | Reply


    where do they get these idiots? there is nothing wrong with soccer, nothing that needs to be changed. it will succeed as is.

  3. DC Cavaliier
    DC Cavaliier
    December 30, 2008 at 1:43 pm | | Reply


    I'm all for making some changes, but not to the goal or field.

    I'd accept something as small as taking a page from our US timed sports and make the stadium scoreboard clock the OFFICIAL clock. Also, I don't care much for a tie, and I would again look at US sports were a tie at all levels of sports are shunned in order for their to be a winner and loser. Maybe a page from hockey where a loser on PK's or a shootout gets at least a point, but 0-0 or 1-1, leaves an empty feeling with me.

  4. Steve Nash
    Steve Nash
    December 30, 2008 at 3:54 pm | | Reply


    This is the dumbest thing I have ever read…

  5. FCU
    FCU
    December 30, 2008 at 4:44 pm | | Reply


    I have an idea myself – how about eliminating all pads and helmets in the NFL? Everyone gets injured in football anyways, so lets be able to see it more clearly. Your soccer ideas? Yeah, those stink.

  6. Brian
    December 30, 2008 at 6:52 pm | | Reply


    To me, trying to “Americanize” soccer is disrespectful to the historic pedigree of of the game in this country, which has a history as long, if not longer, then the game has in England. Most of the so-called “mainstream” sports fans in the US have a bias against soccer that is irrational and cultural. Messing with the game would just be viewed as blatant marketing by Rome and his ilk, which will dift to the sheeple that follow them. Messing with the game in the US would also have a detrimental impact on the USMNT's ability to compete on the global stage. Let's not make this minor league baseball, the growth of the MLS in its short existence, when compared to the NBA and NFL during the same time span, is excellent. Let's focus on improving tactical skills and the officiating, not gimmicks.

  7. CR
    CR
    December 30, 2008 at 7:22 pm | | Reply


    The best argument I've ever heard for enlarging the goals is the fact that the average goalkeeper size has increased considerably since the current goal size was standardized. A proportional increase in the goal size seems entirely reasonable. Then again, I'm a forward, so I'm a bit biased.

  8. John
    John
    December 30, 2008 at 10:47 pm | | Reply


    lol what makes you think the most watched sport on the planet will change in any way to appease a few million in America whose fanship does not need? There is no way that FIFA is changing anything.

    Maybe the NFL should “Europeanize” and make each touchdown worth 1 point so that it creates a fanbase in Europe? Do you realize how silly your suggestions sound?

  9. defmonk
    defmonk
    December 31, 2008 at 6:46 am | | Reply


    Silly or not, this post misses the point entirely. The mountain will come to Mohammed. It is the radical demographic changes in the US that will continue to drive the growth in soccer in the US. If you think that soccer plays to a niche in the US, remember that the great European leagues thrive among national populations that number in the tens of millions, rather than hundreds of millions (the US has nearly 300 million people). Simply put, we don't need a particularly high rate of penetration domestically to have a thriving world-class league. The trick, then, is to achieve a quality of play and fan experience that allows us to build the domestic base and export our “futbol” product (as the EPL have done so successfully. Leave the goal alone.

  10. Beau
    December 31, 2008 at 6:42 pm | | Reply


    “No way that FIFA is changing anything?” Don't be so sure. One day, one of Blatter's offhand ideas might actually come to fruition.

    We've seen a few minor changes in our lifetimes. Remember all those old “Soccer Made In Germany” broadcasts in which the only deterrent force against backpasses to the goalkeeper was the crowd's incessant whistling?

    FIFA also was behind many of the experiments in American history, many of which were enacted by British men in charge of the leagues in this country. Let's not kid ourselves about the rest of the world's willingness to use the USA as a laboratory (and then wash their hands of it later).

    All that said, I'd see some tinkering with the offside law (direct free kicks? Why?) before anyone tinkers with the goals.

  11. Jonathan
    Jonathan
    January 1, 2009 at 6:38 pm | | Reply


    Change the rules and structure, but it will come at a cost. Viewership wil go down. Note that GolTv, FSC, and Setanta are easily available. Create an abomination at the expense of MLS credibility and viewership.

    Isn't the reputation of MLS horrible as it is in the US and CONCACAF?

  12. Soccer Blog
    January 4, 2009 at 10:48 pm | | Reply


    Americanizing soccer? LOL! 1 goal = 10 points. Are American sports fans that dumb?

  13. Level 25 » Blog Archive » google_ads[i].line1 + '


    [...] Disney Online presents World of Cars Online MMO/Virtual World …Thieves make off with thousands of dollars in rims and tires …clean ls vtec 1990 da integra for trade – Midwest Import RacingFS: 16 inch drifter rims(with basically new tires), 4 lug …Any INTEGRA FOR SALE??? – Vancouver ForumCash for Clunkers Pushes Americans Deeper into Debt | Daily …What Was Your First Motor? – Hilux Pickup Owners Club …College Financial Killers | StudenomicsBrass Pedagogy and Performance PracticesAmericanizing Soccer for the U.S. Sports Fan pt. 5 | Major … [...]

  14. dezmembrari masini
    February 16, 2010 at 3:07 am | | Reply


    I dont think it is a good idea. It must be let like now.

  15. Wally
    Wally
    June 12, 2010 at 1:21 am | | Reply


    Why not eliminate the goalie position entirely and see what happens?

  16. joe boland
    joe boland
    July 4, 2010 at 8:20 am | | Reply


    the game desperately needs more goals the way to this is not changing the rules of the game but by league structure.if you give 1 bonus point for a team that scores 3 or more goals one point only for 0-0 Two for a scored draw 6 for awin teams will have come out and try to score goals in the fiftys soccer was a much more high scoring than it is now because of the attitude that their was then.these changes would force teams to attack rather than defend and hope to nick the odd goal

    1. The Gaffer
      The Gaffer
      July 4, 2010 at 9:48 am | | Reply


      Scoring or points is not an issue. Take for example the game between Algeria and the United States. Nil-nil until the 90th minute and one late goal in injury time made it the most incredible ending in US soccer history.

      Cheers,
      The Gaffer

  17. joe boland
    joe boland
    July 5, 2010 at 10:20 am | | Reply


    The us was at least trying to score goals sometimes more attacking play d esnt produce goals but most of the time it does .Everybody including nonamericans like myself would like to see more,because goals generate excitement and the attempts at goal generate excitement .attacking play must be encouraged.In the german bundesliga the goal scoring average is nearly 3 goals a game because it is an attack minded league and one of the best attended professional sport leagues in the world.Other leagues need to be encouraged to come out and play and not defend all day

Leave a Reply